Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the neural substrates for exploratory dynamics in basal ganglia: a model.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2012
Same author

Modeling the role of basal ganglia in saccade generation: is the indirect pathway the explorer?

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2011
Same author

Modeling basal ganglia for understanding Parkinsonian reaching movements.

Neural computation·2010
Same author

Informational dynamics of vasomotion in microvascular networks: a review.

Acta physiologica (Oxford, England)·2010
Same author

What do the basal ganglia do? A modeling perspective.

Biological cybernetics·2010
Same author

A model of indispensability of a large glial layer in cerebrovascular circulation.

Neural computation·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

A phase dynamic model of systematic error in simple copying tasks.

Saguna Dubey1, Sandeep Sambaraju, Sarat Chandra Cautha

  • 1Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India.

Biological Cybernetics
|September 29, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study models handwriting dynamics, revealing that visuomotor system errors in copying lines stem from inherent ambiguity. A phase dynamic model accurately explains systematic orientation errors and directional "flips" in human handwriting.

More Related Videos

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Dynamical Systems Theory
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Handwriting dynamics are often conceptualized as attractors in oscillatory dynamical systems.
  • Understanding visuomotor control is key to analyzing handwriting.
  • Human performance in drawing tasks exhibits systematic patterns and errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a phase dynamic model for visuomotor performance in copying oriented lines.
  • To explain systematic errors and directional flips observed in human handwriting.
  • To elucidate how the visuomotor system handles ambiguity in handwriting tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a nonlinear phase-dynamic model.
  • Experimental studies on human performance in copying oriented lines.
  • Analysis of systematic error patterns and directional flips.

Main Results:

  • Identified systematic errors in the orientation of drawn lines.
  • Observed characteristic "flips" in drawing direction at specific orientations.
  • The proposed model accurately predicts observed error patterns and flipping behavior.

Conclusions:

  • The ambiguity of drawing direction (two opposite directions yielding the same result) is a root cause of handwriting errors.
  • The visuomotor system's attempt to resolve this ambiguity leads to systematic errors.
  • The nonlinear phase-dynamic model provides a robust explanation for handwriting dynamics and errors.