Therapeutic clues in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas - a 30 year experience of 156 cases

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (SDAVF) are rare but remain the most common type of spinal vascular malformations. Treatment options for SDAVF include endovascular embolization, microsurgical dissection or a combination of both. But the optimal treatment paradigm has yet to be defined and may well be an individualized interdisciplinary combinatorial approach.

From 1980 to 2008, 156 patients with the diagnosis of SDAVF were treated by neuroradiological and neurosurgical means. Based on the procedure-related complications we retrospectively analyzed our data to elucidate the reasons for endovascular failure and the evolution of the surgical technique.

156 patients were included in this study. There were 31 (19.9%) female and 125 (80.1%) male patients. Average age at the time of diagnosis was 60.8 years. 102 out of 156 (65.4%) underwent endovascular obliteration, 54 (34.6%) patients were treated primarily by surgery. 134 (85.9%) underwent follow-up examination. A total of 29 (18.6%) out of 156 patients could not be treated successfully by endovascular (9.4%) or surgical (4.1%) means.

Microsurgery can be recommended as the first choice treatment when the fistula's point is unmistakably identified intradurally. Endovascular obliteration may be justifiable in cases with an easy access to a monoradicular feeding artery during diagnostic angiography. Surgery is a definitive treatment with stable long-term results in which procedure-related morbidity is low. During evolution of the combined approach, endovascular coil placement for correct localization of the fistula and the use of intraoperative micro-Doppler was found to be very helpful in increasing the safety of the surgical procedure and minimizing surgical exposure.