Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

M Slater¹, M I Booth, T C B Dehn

¹Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

|September 30, 2009

Summary

Using reusable laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) equipment significantly reduces costs compared to disposable alternatives. This study found substantial savings, demonstrating the economic benefits of reusable surgical instruments for LC procedures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Measurement of <math></math> production with the hadronically decaying boson reconstructed as one or two jets in <i>pp</i> collisions at <math> </math> with ATLAS, and constraints on anomalous gauge couplings.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020

Same author

Study of <math></math> and <math></math> production in <math></math> collisions at <math> </math> and search for anomalous quartic gauge couplings with the ATLAS experiment.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020

Same author

Identification and rejection of pile-up jets at high pseudorapidity with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020

Same author

Measurement of detector-corrected observables sensitive to the anomalous production of events with jets and large missing transverse momentum in <math></math> collisions at <math> </math> TeV using the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020

Same author

Measurement of lepton differential distributions and the top quark mass in <math></math> production in <i>pp</i> collisions at <math> </math> TeV with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020

Same author

Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with two leptons in <math> </math> TeV <i>pp</i> collisions with the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020

Area of Science:

Surgical Innovation
Health Economics
Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

Significant cost variations exist for identical surgical procedures across different healthcare facilities.
The study addresses the economic disparity in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) by comparing reusable versus disposable equipment costs.

Purpose of the Study:

To conduct a comparative cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) using reusable instruments versus disposable equipment.
To determine the financial impact and cost-effectiveness of adopting a policy favoring reusable surgical instruments.

Main Methods:

Prospective data collection from January 2001 to December 2007 for consecutive LC cases.
Comparison of costs between a trust utilizing reusable instruments and an adjacent trust using disposable LC equipment (ports and clip applicators).

Related Experiment Videos

Inclusion of sterilization costs for reusable instruments and exclusion of common disposable items (drapes, tubing, camera sheath).

Main Results:

A total of 1803 LC cases were analyzed over the 7-year study period.
The average cost per LC case using reusable equipment was £49.83, versus £318.75 for disposable equipment.
The use of reusable instruments resulted in average savings of £268.92 per case, totaling £484,861.84 over 7 years.

Conclusions:

A policy prioritizing minimal use of disposable equipment for LC leads to considerable cost savings.
Instrument costs per procedure are 6.4 times higher with disposable sets compared to reusable LC sets.
Extrapolating these savings across the NHS for LC and other laparoscopic surgeries could yield substantial financial benefits without compromising patient safety or efficacy.