Diagnostic approach in children with short stature
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Wilma Oostdijk1, Floor K Grote, Sabine M P F de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
1Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. w.oostdijk@lumc.nl
Insights
Establishing clear referral criteria is crucial for early detection of pathological growth failure. Evidence-based guidelines offer approximately 80% sensitivity for identifying growth disorders, guiding further clinical and laboratory assessments.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Endocrinology
- Diagnostic Medicine
Background:
- Early detection of pathological causes of growth failure requires standardized referral criteria.
- Existing guidelines for referral are based on consensus or evidence-based approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review published guidelines for referring patients with growth failure.
- To outline key clinical, radiological, and laboratory assessments for diagnosing growth disorders.
Main Methods:
- Review of consensus-based and evidence-based referral guidelines.
- Analysis of medical history and physical examination findings.
- Listing of specific investigations based on clinical suspicion.
Main Results:
- Evidence-based guidelines demonstrate approximately 80% sensitivity with a 2% false-positive rate.
- Clinical assessment, hand/wrist X-rays, and laboratory screening are standard investigations.
- Limited scientific evidence exists for specific laboratory screening components.
Conclusions:
- Standardized referral criteria and comprehensive assessments are vital for diagnosing pathological growth failure.
- Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for laboratory screening in growth disorders.
Abstract:
For early detection of pathological causes of growth failure proper referral criteria are needed, as well as a thorough clinical, radiological and laboratory assessment. In this minireview we first discuss the two consensus-based and one evidence-based guidelines for referral that have been published. The evidence-based guidelines result in a sensitivity of approximately 80% at a false-positive rate of 2%. Then, relevant clues from the medical history and physical examination are reviewed, and specific investigations based on clinical suspicion listed. In the absence of abnormal clinical findings, an X-ray of the hand/wrist and a laboratory screen are usually performed. Scientific evidence for the various components of laboratory screening is scarce, but accumulated experience and theoretical considerations have led to a list of investigations that may be considered until more evidence is available.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Karyotyping
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

