Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Typical Model Studies01:30

Typical Model Studies

Fluid mechanics model studies often utilize scaled-down systems to predict fluid behavior in full-scale environments, such as river flows, dam spillways, and structures interacting with open surfaces. Maintaining Froude number similarity in river models is crucial, as it replicates surface flow features like wave patterns and velocities.
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway01:21

Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway

Scaled hydraulic models of dam spillways provide a practical way to replicate and study the intricate flow dynamics of these structures. Often built to a 1:15 ratio, these models allow for observing critical water behavior, such as velocity distribution, flow patterns, and energy dissipation.
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PFAS uptake and xylem storage in trees along an aqueous film-forming foam contaminated groundwater flow path.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Pial Arterial Supply as an Important Component of Arterial Feeders in Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas.

World neurosurgery·2025
Same author

Subgroup analysis of pipeline Flow-Diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A long-term real-world study involving 190 patients.

Neurosurgical review·2025
Same author

The association of healthy eating index score and n-3 fatty acid intake with cardiovascular diseases incidence and lipid biomarkers in Alberta's tomorrow project cohort.

Frontiers in nutrition·2025
Same author

The Effect of Behavioral Intervention on Maternal Breastfeeding Practice and Infant Growth in Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Food science & nutrition·2025
Same author

Predicting the Risk of COVID-19 Among Adult Patients With Diabetes: A Machine Learning Approach.

Canadian journal of diabetes·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
11:19

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Published on: October 21, 2016

A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.

Ming Ye1, Karl F Pohlmann, Jenny B Chapman

  • 1Department of Scientific Computing,Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA. mye@fsu.edu

Ground Water
|October 1, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Model uncertainty significantly impacts groundwater predictions more than parameter uncertainty. Geological interpretations are a larger source of this uncertainty than recharge estimates in the Death Valley Regional Flow System.

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses
11:19

Measuring Carbon-based Contaminant Mineralization Using Combined CO2 Flux and Radiocarbon Analyses

Published on: October 21, 2016

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Hydrogeology
  • Environmental Modeling
  • Geoscience

Background:

  • Groundwater flow systems are complex and require robust modeling for accurate predictions.
  • Uncertainty in model components and parameters is a significant challenge in hydrogeological studies.
  • The Death Valley Regional Flow System (DVRFS) presents unique challenges due to data limitations and geological complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate alternative groundwater flow models for the northern Yucca Flat area within the DVRFS.
  • To quantify and compare the contributions of model uncertainty and parametric uncertainty to predictive uncertainty.
  • To identify the primary sources of uncertainty affecting groundwater flow predictions in the study area.

Main Methods:

  • Development of 25 plausible groundwater flow models by combining different recharge and geological interpretations.
  • Assessment of parametric uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulation within each model.
  • Evaluation of model uncertainty using model averaging techniques, including information criteria and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE).

Main Results:

  • Model uncertainty was found to contribute significantly more to predictive uncertainty than parametric uncertainty.
  • Uncertainty stemming from geological interpretations had a greater impact on predictions than uncertainty from recharge estimates.
  • Weighted residuals showed greater variation across different geological models compared to different recharge models.

Conclusions:

  • Geological interpretations represent a critical source of uncertainty in DVRFS groundwater modeling.
  • Model averaging techniques are essential for managing uncertainty in complex hydrogeological systems.
  • Further research should focus on refining geological models to reduce predictive uncertainty in groundwater flow assessments.