Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

An Approach to Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
[Approaches to the thoracoabdominal aorta]
Insights
The Crawford and modified thoracophrenopararectal approaches offer optimal visualization for thoracoabdominal aorta surgery. The modified thoracophrenopararectal approach is particularly advantageous for aortic isthmus manipulations.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Surgical Approaches
- Aortic Surgery
Background:
- Surgical access to the thoracoabdominal aorta presents significant challenges.
- Optimal visualization and manipulation are crucial for successful aortic procedures.
- Comparative studies are needed to evaluate different surgical approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively study various surgical approaches to the thoracoabdominal aorta.
- To identify the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.
- To determine the optimal surgical access for specific aortic segments.
Main Methods:
- Experimental comparative study design.
- Evaluation of surgical approaches based on visualization, manipulation, wound depth, angle of operative action (AOA), and angle of inclination of the operative action axis (AIOAA).
- Focus on the inferior thoracic aorta, visceral branches, bifurcation, and aortic isthmus.
Main Results:
- The Crawford approach and modified thoracophrenopararectal access provide optimal conditions for the inferior thoracic aorta, visceral branches, and bifurcation.
- These approaches achieved wound depths of 11-15 cm, AOA of 100-110 degrees, and AIOAA of 80-90 degrees.
- The modified thoracophrenopararectal approach demonstrated superior advantages for aortic isthmus manipulations, with specific measurements of wound depth, AOA, and AIOAA.
Conclusions:
- The Crawford and modified thoracophrenopararectal approaches are highly effective for thoracoabdominal aorta surgery.
- The modified thoracophrenopararectal approach is particularly recommended for operations involving the aortic isthmus.
- These findings contribute to optimizing surgical strategies for complex aortic pathologies.
Abstract:
The authors carried out an experimental comparative study of various approaches to the thoracoabdominal aorta, pointing out advantages and disadvantages thereof. The Crawford approach and modified thoracophrenopararectal access have appeared to comply with all the requirements imposed for optimal visualization and manipulation on the inferior thoracic portion, visceral branches and bifurcation of the aorta, with the wound depth measuring 11- 15 cm, the angle of the operative action (AOA) equalling 100-110 degrees, and the angle of inclination of the operative action axis (AIOAA) amounting to 80- 90degrees. While performing manipulations on the isthmus of the aorta, the most advantageous seems to be the modified thoracophrenopararectal approach (wound depth 11.4 +/- 0.2 cm, angle of the operative action 97.0 +/- 3.7 degrees, and the angle of inclination of the operative action axis - 88.0 +/- 2.0 degrees).
Related Concept Videos
Thoracic Aorta
Abdominal Aorta
The celiac trunk, a singular artery, divides into the left gastric artery, which...
The Aorta
The average diameter of the aorta is approximately 2-3 cm, but the size can vary depending on the section of the aorta and the individual's age, sex, and body size. The aorta is...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Veins of Thorax
The azygos vein, positioned just right of the midline and anterior to the vertebral column, begins at the junction of the right ascending lumbar and subcostal veins, terminating in the superior vena cava. This vein drains blood from the right side of the thoracic wall, thoracic viscera, and posterior abdominal wall.
The...
The Arch of Aorta
Encircling the heart, the coronary arteries form a ring-like structure before...

