Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inattentional noise leads to subjective color uniformity across the visual field.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Categorical tonality perception modulates crossmodal correspondences between musical chords and colors.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same author

Auditory scene context facilitates visual recognition of objects in consistent visual scenes.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same author

Attentional allocation and the pan-field color illusion.

Journal of vision·2023
Same author

Cross-modal correspondence between auditory pitch and visual elevation modulates audiovisual temporal recalibration.

Scientific reports·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Published on: July 30, 2020

[Visual cuing effect for haptic angle judgment].

Ataru Era1, Kazuhiko Yokosawa

  • 1Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113- 0033, Japan.

Shinrigaku Kenkyu : the Japanese Journal of Psychology
|October 7, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Visual cues improve judgments of haptic angles. However, location cues alone can lead to overestimation, suggesting they primarily aid motion, not depth perception in virtual environments.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator (TSPAS)

Published on: July 30, 2020

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
08:04

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

Published on: December 4, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Haptics and Human-Computer Interaction
  • Perception and Psychophysics

Context:

  • Investigating the role of visual cues in augmenting virtual haptic feedback.
  • Utilizing a virtual haptic feedback device for exploring 3D angles.

Purpose:

  • To determine the utility of visual cues (location and space cues) in enhancing the accuracy of haptic angle judgments.
  • To understand how different visual cues influence the perception of haptic spatial information.

Summary:

  • Participants judged 3D angles more accurately when presented with both location and space visual cues.
  • Location cues improved motion perception but did not enhance depth perception, leading to overestimation of angles.
  • Space cues did not influence angle judgments when visual cues emphasized depth.

Impact:

  • Findings suggest that integrating complementary visual cues can improve haptic perception accuracy.
  • Highlights the distinct roles of different visual cues in multimodal sensory integration.
  • Provides insights for designing more intuitive and accurate virtual reality and haptic systems.