High pulse pressure as a marker of preclinical cardiovascular disease
Giovanni de Simone1, Marcello Chinali
1Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University Hospital, via S. Pansini 5-80131 Naples, Italy. simogi@unina.it
Insights
Elevated brachial pulse pressure, especially over 63 mmHg, indicates existing cardiovascular damage in hypertension. It should be viewed as a marker of preclinical disease, not a risk factor for developing arterial disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Hypertension Research
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Pulse pressure's prognostic significance is increasingly recognized.
- High systolic and low diastolic pressures offer pathophysiological explanations for pulse pressure's prognostic value.
- Existing research links pulse pressure to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between brachial pulse pressure and cardiovascular damage.
- To determine if elevated brachial pulse pressure signifies established preclinical cardiovascular disease.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of brachial pulse pressure in patients with normal or high peripheral resistance.
- Assessment of left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness in relation to brachial pulse pressure.
Main Results:
- Brachial pulse pressure correlated with increased left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness.
- A brachial pulse pressure exceeding 63 mmHg was identified as a marker of established cardiovascular damage in hypertensive individuals.
Conclusions:
- Elevated brachial pulse pressure is associated with structural and functional cardiovascular changes.
- Brachial pulse pressure over 63 mmHg signifies established preclinical cardiovascular disease in arterial hypertension.
- Suggests reclassifying elevated brachial pulse pressure as a marker of existing disease rather than a future risk factor.
Abstract:
Increasing attention has been focused on the pathophysiology and prognostic relevance of increased pulse pressure. High systolic pressure increases vascular load whereas low diastolic pressure reduces coronary perfusion pressure, both of which provide pathophysiological explanations for the prognostic value of pulse pressure. In a recent study we have demonstrated that in the presence of either normal or high peripheral resistance, brachial pulse pressure is associated with an increase in left ventricular mass and in arterial stiffness. As indicated in our study, a brachial pulse pressure over 63 mmHg represents a sign of established cardiovascular damage in the setting of arterial hypertension. Accordingly, we suggest elevated brachial pulse pressure should be considered a marker of established preclinical cardiovascular disease rather than a risk factor for the development of arterial disease.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical indicator...
Pulse
Pulse Rate and its Significance
Pulse rate, often measured in beats per minute (bpm), reflects the heart rate (HR), which is influenced by numerous factors such as stress, physical activity, and hormonal changes. A normal resting adult pulse rate falls between...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies


