Refractory myocardial ischemic syndromes: patients' characterization and treatment goals
Ran Kornowski1, Shmuel Fuchs, Nili Zafrir
1Tel Aviv University, Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49100, Israel. rkornowski@clalit.org.il
Abstract:
Experimental strategies such as gene transfer and/or cell transplantation have been explored to enrich collateral perfusion and improve contractility in severely ischemic cardiac patients. Nonetheless, the criteria used to define those patients are not uniform and need to be standardized. The authors propose herein standardized definitions in order to characterize the 'no option' ischemic cardiac patients as follows: lack of revascularization options; angina symptoms; limited exercise capacity; perfusion defects; an identifiable target myocardial region. In order to define a favorable clinical effect, the following end points should be the aim of treatment: improved exercise; reduced perfusion defects; improved angina or equivalent symptoms; augmented myocardial stress response; better quality of life parameters following treatment; improved collateral-dependent perfusion. The authors propose that such a systematic approach for patient evaluation should be considered to allow an accurate assessment of treatment efficacy and the comparison of results between alternative myocardial revascularization trials.
Insights
Standardized definitions are proposed for "no option" ischemic heart patients to improve treatment assessment. This systematic approach aims to accurately evaluate therapies for myocardial revascularization and enhance patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Experimental therapies like gene transfer and cell transplantation aim to improve perfusion and contractility in ischemic heart disease.
- Current patient selection criteria for these advanced therapies are inconsistent, hindering research and clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose standardized definitions for identifying "no option" ischemic cardiac patients.
- To establish clear endpoints for evaluating the efficacy of myocardial revascularization strategies.
Main Methods:
- Defining patient characteristics: lack of revascularization options, angina symptoms, limited exercise capacity, perfusion defects, and identifiable target regions.
- Establishing treatment endpoints: improved exercise tolerance, reduced perfusion defects, symptom relief, enhanced myocardial stress response, better quality of life, and improved collateral-dependent perfusion.
Main Results:
- Proposed standardized criteria for patient selection in "no option" ischemic heart disease.
- Defined favorable clinical effect endpoints to assess treatment efficacy.
Conclusions:
- A systematic approach to patient evaluation and treatment endpoint assessment is crucial for "no option" ischemic cardiac patients.
- Standardized definitions will enable accurate efficacy assessment and facilitate comparison across different myocardial revascularization trials.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Angina IV: Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management

