Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Is multislice computed tomography of value for the imaging of myocardial infarction?
Karam Souibri1, Gerald M Pohost
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) both accurately assess acute myocardial infarction. However, MSCT involves radiation and contrast risks, and cannot detect myocardial scarring, unlike CMR.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial contrast-enhanced (CE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a validated technique for assessing myocardial infarction.
- Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is a newer imaging modality suggested for acute myocardial infarction.
- Both techniques offer high resolution and are less invasive than catheterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of 16-slice computed tomography (MSCT) in assessing myocardial viability in acute myocardial infarction.
- To compare MSCT with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for infarct assessment.
- To determine the most appropriate imaging approach for acute and chronic myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of myocardial viability assessment between MSCT and CE-CMR.
- Evaluation of infarct localization and size determination using both imaging modalities.
- Assessment of limitations including radiation exposure, contrast agent risks, and scar imaging capabilities.
Main Results:
- Both MSCT and CMR demonstrated agreement in infarct localization and size determination.
- MSCT exposes patients to significant ionizing radiation.
- MSCT requires iodinated contrast agents, posing potential kidney risks.
- MSCT cannot visualize myocardial scarring, a key consequence of infarction.
Conclusions:
- While both MSCT and CMR can identify acute myocardial infarction, CMR offers advantages in assessing myocardial scarring.
- MSCT's risks (radiation, contrast) must be weighed against its benefits.
- The choice of imaging modality should consider the need to evaluate both acute damage and chronic scarring.
Abstract:
Evaluation of: Mahnken A, Koos R, Katoh M et al.: Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 12, 2042-2047 (2005). Myocardial contrast-enhanced (CE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a relatively new and well-validated technique for imaging both cell damage and scar resulting from myocardial infarction. Multislice (16-slice) x-ray computed tomography (MSCT) has recently been suggested as a means for imaging acute myocardial infarction. Both CMR and MSCT are becoming increasingly available, are less invasive than catheter-based techniques and have high spatial three-dimensional resolution, allowing interrogation and sizing of acute myocardial infarction. The cell damage in acute myocardial infarction may be distinguished from normal myocardium by either technique. But while both CMR and MSCT show agreement for infarct localization and size determination, MSCT exposes the patient to substantial ionizing radiation and to possible kidney damage associated with the necessary administration of radio-opaque, iodinated, contrast medium. Furthermore MSCT does not demonstrate the presence of pathological consequences of myocardial infarction, myocardial scarring. These points must be considered when choosing the most appropriate approach for the imaging of acute and/or chronic myocardial infarction.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
