Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Protection of H9c2 Myocardial Cells from Oxidative Stress by Crocetin via PINK1/Parkin Pathway-Mediated Mitophagy
Published on: May 26, 2023
The evolving role of rescue therapy for acute myocardial infarction
George M Tadros1, Elias A Iliadis, Robert F Wilson
1University of Minnesota, Division of Cardiology,420 Delaware Street East, MMC 508Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. tadr0003@umn.edu
Insights
For ST-elevation myocardial infarction, fibrinolysis followed by transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe. Rescue PCI significantly reduces mortality and morbidity compared to conservative care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requires prompt reperfusion.
- Fibrinolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are primary reperfusion strategies.
- Primary PCI offers superior reperfusion but limited global accessibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of transferring STEMI patients post-fibrinolysis for angiography and potential rescue PCI.
- To assess the effectiveness of rescue PCI in improving outcomes for patients with inadequate reperfusion after fibrinolysis.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing fibrinolysis with subsequent transfer for rescue PCI versus conservative management.
- Analysis of patient transfer protocols and diagnostic angiography utilization.
- Evaluation of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity data.
Main Results:
- Transfer for diagnostic angiography and rescue PCI post-fibrinolysis is safe and feasible.
- Rescue PCI, particularly with stents and antiplatelet therapy, significantly reduces cardiovascular mortality and morbidity compared to conservative treatment.
- Inadequate reperfusion after fibrinolysis remains a challenge, highlighting the need for effective rescue strategies.
Conclusions:
- Transferring STEMI patients for rescue PCI after fibrinolysis is a viable strategy to improve outcomes.
- The increasing adoption of primary PCI and regional networks may reduce the future need for rescue PCI.
- Optimizing patient selection and timely intervention are crucial for managing STEMI.
Abstract:
Coronary reperfusion for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction can be accomplished with fibrinolytic therapy or with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Primary PCI provides more effective and sustained early reperfusion than fibrinolytic therapy, but is only available in a minority of hospitals worldwide. There is a lack of a definite method for identification of patients who have inadequate reperfusion after fibrinolysis. Transfer of patients after fibrinolysis for diagnostic angiography and possible rescue therapy is safe and feasible. Rescue PCI with the use of stents and antiplatelet therapy decreases cardiovascular mortality and morbidity compared with conservative therapy. Increasing use of primary PCI and forming networks to transfer patients to centers that offer primary PCI may decrease the need for rescue therapy in the future.
More Related Videos
09:47A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique
Published on: April 26, 2015
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management