Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026
Surgical Angiogenesis in Porcine Tibial Allotransplantation: A New Large Animal Bone Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation Model
Published on: August 13, 2017
Tantalum is a good bone graft substitute in tibial tubercle advancement
Mariano Fernandez-Fairen1, Virginia Querales, Alexander Jakowlew
1Instituto de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología de Barcelona, Barcelona 08034, Spain. mferfai@gmail.com
Background:
Porous tantalum is reportedly a good substitute for structural bone graft in several applications. So far, its use has not been reported in tibial tuberosity anteriorization (TTA) for treatment of isolated degenerative chondral lesions of the patellofemoral joint.
Questions/Purposes:
We asked whether the use of this material would produce similar standardized functional scores, pain (VAS), fusion rates, complications, and patient satisfaction to those for bone graft.
Patients And Methods:
We performed a randomized, controlled trial in 101 patients (108 knees) scheduled for TTA comparing a porous tantalum implant (57 knees) with an autologous local tibial bone graft (51 knees). The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 6.2 years; range, 5-8 years).
Results:
At the last followup, clinical scores, fusion rates, and maintenance of the anteriorization either were better or similar for the TTA using the tantalum implant depending on the respective parameter. The operative technique was easier and shorter with the tantalum device. Complication and failure rates were greater using bone graft. Patient satisfaction was greater using the tantalum implant.
Conclusions:
Porous tantalum provided a reasonable alternative to bone graft in TTA.
Level Of Evidence:
Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
