Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Cost-Efficient Transcriptomic-Based Drug Screening
Published on: February 23, 2024
Microcosting versus DRGs in the provision of cost estimates for use in pharmacoeconomic evaluation
Adrienne Heerey1, Bernie McGowan, Mairin Ryan
1National Center for Pharmacoeconomics, Rialto Gate, St. James Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. aheerey@stjames.ie
Abstract:
Investigating the pharmacoeconomic impact of any diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in the Irish healthcare setting is currently compromised by the lack of detailed cost data. Consequently, we conducted a number of microcosting studies in the areas of acute myocardial infarction, cardiac failure and HIV, from the hospital perspective. The results of these microcosting studies were compared with the costing estimates assigned to hospital admissions, based on the diagnosis-related group system. Differences ranged from 9 to 66%. It was concluded that the diagnosis related group system is a useful estimate of costs for patient admissions in the absence of detailed cost of illness data. However, supplementary costing studies should be performed for certain therapeutic areas, particularly those where investigation and/or treatment costs are high.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Dosage Regimen: Individualization

