Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive Healthcare Services

Preventive healthcare services keep people healthy via frequent check-ups, screening, and counseling. They primarily aid in disease prevention rather than treating an acute or chronic illness. Preventive treatment also keeps individuals productive and energetic, allowing them to work well into their retirement years. Examples of preventive care services include:

Secondary Healthcare System

Secondary Healthcare System

Secondary healthcare is offered by a specialist, generally in hospitals or clinics for patients referred by primary healthcare providers. It occurs when a person has an illness or injury that requires specific medical care. Secondary care is often referred to as acute care. Secondary care can range from uncomplicated care to repair a minor laceration or treat a strep throat infection to more complicated emergent care, such as treating a head injury sustained in an automobile accident. Whatever...

Traditional Level Of Health Care System

Traditional Level Of Health Care System

The levels of care describe the services provided in the healthcare system. Accordingly, there are six levels of the traditional healthcare system in the US: preventive, primary, secondary, tertiary, restorative, and continuing healthcare. A nurse must understand how the healthcare industry organizes and provides services within these levels of care.
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...

Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology

Early Ischemia and Ionic ImbalanceWithin minutes of spinal cord injury, a secondary cascade begins, progressing over hours to weeks. Vascular damage reduces blood flow, causing ischemia and mitochondrial dysfunction. ATP depletion leads to ion pump failure, membrane depolarization, sodium influx, potassium efflux, and water accumulation, resulting in cellular swelling. Increased intracellular calcium further disrupts mitochondria and accelerates cellular injury.Excitotoxicity and Neuronal...

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

International trends in clozapine use: a study in 17 countries.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2017

Same author

Outpatient calcium-channel blockers and the risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a cohort study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2013

Same author

Differential risk of death in older residents in nursing homes prescribed specific antipsychotic drugs: population based cohort study.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2012

Same author

The design of an observational study of hypertension management, adherence and pressure control in Blood Pressure Success Zone Program participants.

International journal of clinical practice·2008

Same author

Oxybutynin extended release and tolterodine immediate release : a health economic comparison.

Clinical drug investigation·2007

Same author

Postmarketing studies: benefits and risks.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2006

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Secondary prevention fallacy: pitfalls in comparing with primary.

J J Caro¹, K F Huybrechts, W S Klittich

¹jcaro@caroresearch.com

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

|October 8, 2009

Summary

Preventing illness is culturally valued, but economic analyses suggest secondary prevention offers better healthcare value than primary prevention. This study questions if this finding is accurate or a flaw in cost-effectiveness analysis methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Health economics
Preventive medicine
Healthcare policy

Background:

Cultural wisdom favors preventing illness over curing it, as seen in proverbs like 'an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure'.
However, economic evaluations in healthcare often contradict this, indicating secondary prevention is more cost-effective than primary prevention.
This discrepancy raises questions about the validity of these economic findings and the methodologies used.

Purpose of the Study:

To critically evaluate the economic evidence comparing primary and secondary prevention in healthcare.
To determine if the observed cost-effectiveness differences reflect true value or methodological limitations.
To re-examine the principle that prevention is better than cure within the context of healthcare economics.

Main Methods:

Review and analysis of existing cost-effectiveness studies in healthcare.
Examination of the methodologies and assumptions employed in economic evaluations of preventive interventions.
Comparative analysis of primary versus secondary prevention strategies based on available economic data.

Main Results:

Economic analyses frequently show secondary prevention yielding better value for money than primary prevention.
Potential flaws in the application of cost-effectiveness analysis may influence these results.
The traditional wisdom that prevention is superior may be challenged by current economic assessments.

Conclusions:

The assertion that secondary prevention is more cost-effective than primary prevention in healthcare warrants further investigation.
Methodological limitations in cost-effectiveness analyses may be contributing to this counterintuitive finding.
A re-evaluation of healthcare economic methodologies is needed to accurately assess the value of preventive strategies.