Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Heart failure care in the outpatient cardiology practice setting: findings from IMPROVE HF
Gregg C Fonarow1, Clyde W Yancy, Nancy M Albert
1Department of Medicine, Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1679, USA. gfonarow@mednet.ucla.edu
Insights
Contemporary heart failure (HF) care varies widely among outpatient cardiology practices. Many eligible patients do not receive all guideline-recommended therapies, indicating a need for improved HF management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Limited data exist on current heart failure (HF) management in outpatient settings.
- The IMPROVE HF study addresses this gap by examining care patterns in US cardiology practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize contemporary management of chronic HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (< or =35%).
- To assess the utilization of guideline-recommended therapies in a national registry of outpatient cardiology practices.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study involving 167 US outpatient cardiology practices.
- Chart abstraction collected data on 15,381 patients with diagnosed HF or prior myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction.
- Assessed 7 individual and composite care metrics for eligible patients without contraindications.
Main Results:
- High use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (80%) and beta-blocker (86%) was observed.
- Lower rates of aldosterone antagonist (36%), device therapy (51% for ICD/CRT-D, 39% for CRT), and HF education (61%) were noted.
- A median of only 27% of eligible patients received all recommended HF therapies, with wide practice variation.
Conclusions:
- These findings represent early data on outpatient HF treatment post-latest national guidelines.
- Substantial variation exists among cardiology practices in documented HF therapy delivery.
- Highlights potential areas for improving guideline adherence and patient outcomes in HF care.
Background:
Few data exist regarding contemporary care patterns for heart failure (HF) in the outpatient setting. IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize current management of patients with chronic HF and ejection fraction < or =35% in a national registry of 167 US outpatient cardiology practices.
Methods And Results:
Baseline patient characteristics and data on care of 15381 patients with diagnosed HF or prior myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction were collected by chart abstraction. To quantify use of therapies, 7 individual metrics (use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blocker, aldosterone antagonist, anticoagulation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and HF education) and composite metrics were assessed. Care metrics include only patients documented to be eligible and without contraindications or intolerance. Among practices, 69% were nonteaching. Patients were 71% male, with a median age of 70 years, and a median ejection fraction of 25%. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (80%) and beta-blocker (86%) was relatively high in eligible patients in the outpatient cardiology setting; other metrics, such as aldosterone antagonist (36%), device therapy (implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator, 51%; cardiac resynchronization therapy, 39%), and education (61%), showed lower rates of use. A median 27% of patients received all HF therapies for which they were potentially eligible on the basis of chart documentation. Use of guideline-recommended therapies by practices varied widely.
Conclusions:
These data are among the first to assess treatment in the outpatient setting since the release of the latest national HF guidelines and to demonstrate substantial variation among cardiology practices in the documented therapies provided to HF patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
