Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Modeling Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus of Prematurity in Rats
Published on: March 28, 2025
Does idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus always mean a poor prognosis?
Michael Kiefer1, Ulrich Meier, Regina Eymann
1Department of Neurosurgery, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg-Saar, Germany. Michael.Kiefer@uks.eu
Insights
Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) does not inherently indicate a worse prognosis. Favorable preconditions in iNPH patients can lead to outcomes similar to or better than other hydrocephalus types.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Neurology
- Medical Research
Background:
- Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is often perceived to have a poorer prognosis compared to other forms of hydrocephalus.
- Assessing prognostic factors is crucial for effective patient management and treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) carries a worse prognosis than other hydrocephalus subtypes.
- To identify factors influencing the prognosis of iNPH patients post-shunting.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 125 patients with chronic hydrocephalus (75 iNPH, 50 non-iNPH) underwent shunting with gravitational valves.
- Clinical status was assessed using the clinical grading (KI) and comorbidity index (CMI).
- Statistical analyses included Spearman, Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, chi(2), and Wilcoxon U tests (p < 0.05).
Main Results:
- Shunt responder rates were 72% for iNPH and 86% for non-iNPH.
- iNPH patients with shorter disease duration or lower preoperative KI showed outcomes comparable to or better than non-iNPH patients.
- A low comorbidity index (CMI ≤3) in iNPH patients correlated with an 86% improvement rate, versus 64% in non-iNPH patients with higher CMI.
Conclusions:
- The diagnosis of iNPH alone does not predict a worse prognosis.
- Favorable preconditions, such as shorter disease duration and lower comorbidity, can lead to similar or better outcomes in iNPH patients compared to other hydrocephalus types.
- Worse overall outcomes in iNPH are often attributed to delayed diagnosis and more severe comorbidities.
Objective:
The objective was to assess whether idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) has a worse prognosis than other forms of hydrocephalus, as has been suggested.
Methods:
A total of 125 patients with chronic hydrocephalus, 75 of whom suffered from iNPH and the remaining (non-INPH) from sNPH or non-communicating hydrocephalus, were shunted using gravitational valves. Clinical state was assessed with our clinical grading (KI) and a co-morbidity index (CMI). Average follow-up was 5.1 +/- 1.6 years.
Statistics:
Spearman, Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, chi(2)- and the Wilcoxon U tests at a significance level of pi < 0.05 were used.
Results:
Shunt responder rates for iNPH and non-iNPH were 72% and 86%, respectively. With shorter anamnesis (< or =1 year) or preoperative KI < 6 points, iNPH patients had a similar or even better outcome than non-iNPH patients with longer anamnesis or a worse KI. Most impressive was the influence of co-morbidity: 86% of iNPH patients with a low CMI (< or =3 points) experienced clinical improvement after shunting, which was contrasted by a responder rate of 64% for non-iNPH with worse CMI.
Conclusion:
The diagnosis of iNPH does not by itself mean a worse prognosis, and iNPH patients with favorable preconditions may have a similar or better prognosis than patients with any other kind of hydrocephalus. The worse overall clinical results of iNPH result from late recognition and in most instances worse preconditions.
Related Concept Videos
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology
Huntington Disease l: Introduction
Glaucoma: Overview
Cytotoxic Edema: Pathophysiology
