Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026

Same author

Acoustic Scene-Aware Processing and Auditory Model-Based Compensation Strategies.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026

Same author

Using more realistic speech material to enhance ecological validity in the Everyday Conversational Danish Sentence Test.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same author

Phoneme Perception in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids in Quiet, Noise, and Reverberation.

Ear and hearing·2026

Same author

A comparison of hearing abilities in memory clinic patients with mild cognitive impairment and cognitively intact older adults.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026

Same author

Intratumoral microbiota and host genotype cooperatively shape neutrophil cytotoxic functions in colorectal cancer.

Cell host & microbe·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity.

Olaf Strelcyk¹, Dimitrios Christoforidis, Torsten Dau

¹Centre for Applied Hearing Research, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 352, Ørsteds Plads, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

|October 10, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Hearing-impaired listeners generally showed faster cochlear response times, measured by auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Cochlear response time correlated with auditory filter bandwidth, offering insights into hearing impairment effects.

More Related Videos

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

Area of Science:

Auditory Neuroscience
Hearing Science
Audiology

Background:

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) provide objective measures of auditory system function.
Understanding cochlear response times is crucial for diagnosing hearing impairments.
Frequency selectivity, or the ability to distinguish between different sound frequencies, is often affected by hearing loss.

Purpose of the Study:

To objectively estimate cochlear response times using derived-band ABRs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
To investigate the relationship between cochlear response times and behavioral estimates of auditory-filter bandwidth.
To explore how sensorineural hearing impairment impacts the spatiotemporal processing within the cochlea.

Main Methods:

Derived-band click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded from normal-hearing (NH) and sensorineurally hearing-impaired (HI) participants.
Latencies from ABRs were analyzed as a function of derived-band center frequency and click level to estimate cochlear response times.
Auditory-filter bandwidths at 2 kHz were measured behaviorally using a notched-noise masking paradigm for the same participants.

Main Results:

Generally, hearing-impaired listeners exhibited shorter derived-band ABR latencies compared to normal-hearing listeners.
Prolonged latencies were observed in some hearing-impaired listeners, specifically at low click sensation levels.
Behavioral auditory-filter bandwidths significantly predicted the variability in ABR latencies, with wider filters correlating with shorter cochlear response times.

Conclusions:

Cochlear response time is inversely related to auditory-filter bandwidth in human listeners, aligning with linear-system theory.
The findings establish a link between objective measures of cochlear processing speed (ABR latency) and frequency selectivity (filter bandwidth).
This study provides valuable insights into how sensorineural hearing impairment alters the spatiotemporal patterns of cochlear activity.