Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sarcopenia does not affect total liver function measured using technetium-99m mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy.

EJNMMI research·2026
Same author

One-stage versus two-stage surgery for initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: post hoc analysis of the CAIRO5 trial.

BJS open·2025
Same author

Empathy and tolerance of ambiguity in medical students and doctors participating in art-based observational training at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: a before-and-after study

Journal of educational evaluation for health professions·2025
Same author

National consensus on a new resectability classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma - A modified Delphi method.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2023
Same author

Intersurgeon Variability in Local Treatment Planning for Patients with Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Analysis of the Liver Expert Panel of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.

Annals of surgical oncology·2023
Same author

Comment on: "Left Hepatic Trisectionectomy With Caudate Lobectomy: Demanding but Essential Routine Surgical Procedure for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma".

Annals of surgery·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:41

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: March 10, 2023

Open versus laparoscopic resection for liver tumours.

Thomas van Gulik1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.m.vangulik@amc.uva.nl

HPB : the Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
|October 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic liver resections offer shorter hospital stays for malignant tumors but lack long-term oncological data. Further controlled trials are needed to compare outcomes with open liver resections.

Keywords:
hepatectomylaparoscopyliver resectionmalignant tumourminimally invasive surgery

More Related Videos

Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:23

Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: April 19, 2022

Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
04:22

Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

Published on: March 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:41

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: March 10, 2023

Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:23

Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: April 19, 2022

Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
04:22

Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

Published on: March 3, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Hepatobiliary Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Debate exists on whether laparoscopic liver resections for malignant tumors yield outcomes comparable to conventional open liver resections.
  • Assessing the oncological equivalence and safety of minimally invasive approaches in liver surgery is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current literature comparing laparoscopic and open liver resections for malignant tumors.
  • To evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes, including oncological safety, of both surgical techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A literature review was conducted focusing on studies related to liver resection and the application of laparoscopy.
  • Analysis of existing case-control series and discussion of the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Main Results:

  • No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) currently exist to definitively support the benefits of laparoscopic liver resections for liver tumors.
  • Short-term outcomes suggest laparoscopic liver resection may reduce hospital stay length.
  • Long-term survival studies demonstrating oncological equivalence to open resection are currently lacking.

Conclusions:

  • The oncological integrity of laparoscopic liver resection requires rigorous testing in controlled trials, similar to colorectal cancer surgery.
  • Future research should focus on establishing oncological safety and comparing laparoscopic techniques with optimized open procedures (fast-track).
  • The learning curve associated with mastering laparoscopic liver resection techniques presents a significant challenge.