Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
Synesthesia01:27

Synesthesia

Synesthesia is a remarkable condition where stimulation of one sensory or cognitive pathway leads to automatic, involuntary experiences in a second sensory or cognitive pathway. People with synesthesia experience a blending or crossing of their senses, such as sight and sound, leading to cross-modal sensations. In this condition, the stimulation of one sense, such as hearing a number or musical note, triggers an experience of another sense, like sensing a specific color, taste, or smell. People...
Introduction to Special Senses01:26

Introduction to Special Senses

Sensory receptors play an integral part in comprehending our external and internal environments. They receive diverse stimuli, converting them into the nervous system's electrochemical signals. This conversion occurs as the stimulus alters the sensory neuron's cell membrane potential, instigating the generation of an action potential. This action potential is subsequently transmitted to the central nervous system (CNS), which integrates with other sensory data or higher cognitive functions.
Sensory Memory01:14

Sensory Memory

Sensory memory captures information from the environment in its original form for a very brief duration, just long enough to be exposed to visual, auditory, and other senses. This type of memory is detailed and rich but quickly lost unless certain strategies are employed to transfer it into short-term or long-term memory. Sensory information is continuously bombarding the human brain, yet only a small fraction is absorbed, as most of it does not significantly impact daily life. For instance,...
Overview of Somatic Sensory Pathways01:29

Overview of Somatic Sensory Pathways

Somatic sensory or somatosensory pathways refer to the neural pathways that carry information related to touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and proprioception from the skin, muscles, tendons, and joints to the brain. These pathways involve several stages of processing and integration of sensory information.
The somatosensory system is divided into three main pathways: the dorsal (or posterior) column-medial lemniscus, spinothalamic (or anterolateral), and spinocerebellar pathways.
The dorsal...
Tactile and Chemical Senses01:27

Tactile and Chemical Senses

Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex. This...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neuropsychological assessment in adult epilepsy: rationale, test selection, and clinical integration across non-surgical care in Italian patients.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Editorial: Psychological factors as determinants of medical conditions, volume III.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Case Report: Tailored automatic speech recognition in global aphasia with dysarthria - a single case proof of concept.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences·2026
Same author

Comparative cross-sectional analysis of the Griffiths III and the Developmental Autism Early Screening (DAES) test in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

BMC psychiatry·2026
Same author

Determinants of caregiver burden in advanced Parkinson's disease: a multidimensional and sex-sensitive perspective.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2026
Same author

Correction: A meta-analysis and systematic review of creativity in schizophrenia: toward an ecological understanding integrating clinical and philosophical perspectives.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

Timing flickers across sensory modalities.

Carmelo Mario Vicario1, Gaetano Rappo, Anna Maria Pepi

  • 1Dipartimento di Psicologia, Universita di Roma La Sapienza, via dei Marsi 78, I 00100 Rome, Italy. carmelo.vicario@uniroma1.it

Perception
|October 13, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory distractors in specific spatial locations altered visual duration perception, but visual distractors did not affect auditory timing. This reveals an asymmetric multisensory interaction between space and time perception.

More Related Videos

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Subjective duration perception can be influenced by spatial factors, suggesting a link between spatial attention and temporal processing.
  • The precise mechanisms underlying these perceptual shifts in subjective duration, particularly across different sensory modalities, remain unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if temporal performance is modulated by spatial distractors from different sensory modalities.
  • To examine cross-modal interactions between spatial and temporal perception.

Main Methods:

  • Healthy participants performed visual and auditory duration comparison tasks.
  • Tasks involved exposure to spatially presented distractors from the other sensory modality (auditory distractors during visual timing, visual distractors during auditory timing).

Main Results:

  • Auditory distractors presented in specific spatial locations biased visual duration judgments (underestimation on the left, overestimation on the right).
  • Visual distractors did not affect the timing of auditory stimuli.
  • This indicates an asymmetric influence: auditory spatial cues affect visual time, but not vice versa.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the existence of multisensory interactions between spatial and temporal processing.
  • An asymmetry was observed, with auditory spatial distractors influencing visuo-temporal perception, but not the reverse.
  • This asymmetry may stem from inherent differences in the sensory processing of auditory and visual systems.