Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Oral Gavage in Neonatal Mouse Pups and Functional Assessment of Gut Barrier Integrity Using Ussing Chambers
Published on: January 9, 2026
Neonatal gastrointestinal perforation
Koushi Asabe1, Yoichiro Oka, Hiroki Kai
1Division of Thoracic, Endocrine and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Insights
Neonatal gastrointestinal perforation, particularly in extremely low birth weight infants, still has high mortality. Improvements in care are noted, but outcomes for premature infants remain critical, especially for necrotizing enterocolitis cases.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal surgery
- Pediatric gastroenterology
- Perinatal medicine
Background:
- Neonatal gastrointestinal perforation presents a significant mortality risk, especially for extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWIs).
- Japanese national data from 2003 indicated a 31.6% mortality rate for neonatal GI perforation.
- Fukuoka University Hospital reported a 50% mortality rate in 34 surgically treated neonates between 1974 and 2003.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze prognostic factors and outcomes of neonatal gastrointestinal perforation.
- To compare surgical outcomes between early and recent treatment periods.
- To identify specific challenges in managing extremely premature infants with GI perforation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 34 surgically treated neonatal GI perforation cases from 1974 to 2003.
- Categorization of cases into survival and non-survival groups across early (1974-1997) and recent (1998-2004) periods.
- Comparison of prognostic factors including gestational week, birth weight, and operative weight.
Main Results:
- Common etiologies included necrotizing enterocolitis (35.3%), meconium peritonitis (25%), and idiopathic perforation (25%).
- Non-surviving neonates in the recent period had significantly lower gestational week, birth weight, and operative weight.
- Despite advances in neonatal intensive care, mortality remains high for extremely premature infants (<1000g, <29 weeks gestational age), predominantly those with necrotizing enterocolitis.
Conclusions:
- While neonatal intensive care has improved surgical outcomes, extremely premature infants with GI perforation face a high mortality risk.
- Necrotizing enterocolitis is a major contributor to mortality in this vulnerable population.
- Substantial improvements in medical treatment strategies are necessary for extremely premature infants suffering from gastrointestinal perforation.
Abstract:
Infants, especially extremely low birth weight infants (ELBWIs, birth weight <1,000 g) continue to have a high mortality after gastrointestinal (GI) perforation. In Japan, the overall mortality rate for neonates under 30 days having GI perforation was 31.6% in 2003. From 1974 to 2003, 34 cases of GI perforation in neonates were treated surgically in Fukuoka University Hospital. The overall mortality rate was 50% (17 of 34). Etiologies included necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (35.3%), meconium peritonitis (25%), idiopathic (25%), and gastric perforation (11.8%). The present series was divided into four groups: survival and non-survival neonates of the early (1974 to 1997) and recent (1998 to 2004) periods. Several prognostic factors of neonatal GI perforation were compared between several groups. The gestational week (GW) at birth, birth weight (BW) and weight at operation were significantly lower for non-surviving neonates in the recent period compared with the other three groups. Although a real improvement in surgical outcome was noted with improved neonatal intensive care management, the mortality rate was still high, especially in extremely premature cases under both 1,000 g and 29 GWs. The vast majority of these extremely premature babies thus comprised the NEC patients. It is therefore necessary to substantially improve the medical treatment level for such premature babies.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Intestinal Obstruction II: Pathophysiology
