Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in focal cortical dysplasia (malformations of cortical development)

Wendy A Chamberlain1, Mark L Cohen, Kymberly A Gyure

  • 1Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Epilepsia
|October 13, 2009
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Reproducibility of the Palmini classification for cortical dysplasia was assessed. Agreement was moderate between neuropathologists, with better consensus for FCD types IIA/B than mild MCD or FCD types IA/B.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropathology
  • Epilepsy Research
  • Histological Classification

Background:

  • Malformations of cortical development (MCD) are significant causes of intractable epilepsy.
  • A histologic classification system for MCD by Palmini et al. (2004) exists but lacks reproducibility studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the inter- and intraobserver agreement for the Palmini classification system among neuropathologists.
  • To determine the reproducibility of classifying different types of cortical dysplasias.

Main Methods:

  • Eight neuropathologists classified sections from 26 epilepsy resections representing various MCD pathologies.
  • Sections were re-evaluated for intraobserver agreement, and Kappa analysis was used to assess concordance.

Main Results:

  • Moderate interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.4968) was found, with 62.5% agreement for 19/26 cases.
  • Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) types IIA/B showed the highest concordance (>=75% consensus in 12/14 cases).
  • Mild MCD (types I/II) and FCD types IA/B were least reproducible, with significant changes upon reevaluation (52.9% for mild MCD).

Conclusions:

  • The Palmini classification system demonstrates moderate interobserver concordance.
  • FCD types IIA/B are more reliably classified than mild MCD or FCD types IA/B.
  • Distinguishing mild MCD/FCD type I from normal or gliotic tissue presents a challenge.

Related Concept Videos