Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
The association between intensive glycemic control and vascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a
1Department of Cardiology, Shanghai 6th People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao tong University School of Medicine, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, PR China.
Insights
For type 2 diabetes, targeting an HbA1c below 7.0% offers no macrovascular benefit and increases hypoglycemia risk. A target of 7.0-7.9% shows microvascular benefits without increased hypoglycemia.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Diabetes Research
Background:
- The link between lowering glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes is unclear, making HbA1c targets controversial.
- Intensive glycemic control aims to reduce diabetes-related complications but carries risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of intensive versus standard glycemic control on macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- To determine optimal glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets for managing vascular events.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intensive and standard glycemic control.
- Primary endpoint: combined macrovascular complications (cardiac events, stroke, peripheral vascular disease).
- Analysis using fixed and random effect models.
Main Results:
- Intensive glycemic control targeting HbA1c <7.0% showed no benefit for macrovascular or microvascular complications and increased severe hypoglycemia risk (P<0.00001).
- Intensive glycemic control targeting HbA1c 7.0-7.9% reduced microvascular events (P<0.05) without increasing hypoglycemia (P=0.74), but did not impact macrovascular complications (P>0.1).
Conclusions:
- A target HbA1c level of 7.0-7.9% appears more beneficial than <7.0% for patients with established type 2 diabetes.
- This target range may offer a better balance between microvascular benefits and hypoglycemia risk.
Background And Aim:
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the relationship between lowering glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and macrovascular complications is not clear and therefore lowering the level of HbA(1c) is controversial.
Methods And Results:
We searched for all randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of intensive and standard glycemic control on vascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was combined macrovascular complications, including cardiac events, stroke and peripheral vascular disease. Fixed and random effect models were used to analyze the results. Eight studies were included according to selection criteria. The results showed no benefits of intensive glycemic control on macrovascular and microvascular complications (P>0.1), but a higher rate of severe hypoglycemia (P<0.00001) in the intensive control group when the target HbA(1c) level was <7.0%. When the target HbA(1c) level was lowered to 7.0-7.9%, intensive glycemic control showed benefits on the reduction of microvascular events (P<0.05) without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia (P=0.74), but no influence on macrovascular complications (P>0.1).
Conclusion:
The results of this analysis suggest that a target HbA(1c) level of 7.0-7.9% may be a better glycemic control target than that of <7.0% in patients with established type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Complications of Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetic Retinopathy
Type II Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Type I Diabetes II: Pathophysiology
