Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
Methods for developing useful estimates of the costs associated with birth defects
1Texas Department of State Health Services, Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Mail Code 1964, P.O. Box 149347, Austin, TX 78714-9347, USA. amy.case@dshs.state.tx.us
Estimating the lifetime costs of spina bifida in Texas reveals an annual economic burden of $76 million. This study highlights the need for state-specific cost data for birth defect prevention resource allocation.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Birth defect cost estimates inform resource allocation for prevention strategies.
- Spina bifida prevention efforts often focus on folic acid-preventable cases.
- Existing cost-of-illness data for spina bifida may lack state-specific applicability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the total lifetime medical and associated costs for spina bifida cases in Texas.
- To determine program-specific annual costs for spina bifida services in Texas.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Texas live birth prevalence data for spina bifida.
- Applied recent cost-of-illness estimates to a Texas birth cohort.
- Queried government programs for spina bifida service costs.
Main Results:
- Estimated $76 million in lifetime costs for an average annual Texas spina bifida birth cohort.
- Annual infant medical costs estimated at $5 million based on insurance claims.
- Annual public sector program costs for children estimated at $6 million.
Conclusions:
- State birth defects registries can provide valuable cost data for policymakers.
- Addressing information gaps requires applying prevalence data to existing estimates.
- Incorporating actual claims and program expenditures enhances state-specific cost figures.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Probability Laws
Regression Toward the Mean
Teratogenicity
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

