Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy In Children: A Case Report with Literature Review
Published on: March 27, 2026
Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review
Andreas Lundh1, Sebastiaan L Knijnenburg, Anders W Jørgensen
1Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital/Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands. chcrg@amc.uva.nl
Background:
To ensure evidence-based decision making in pediatric oncology systematic reviews are necessary. The objective of our study was to evaluate the methodological quality of all currently existing systematic reviews in pediatric oncology.
Methods:
We identified eligible systematic reviews through a systematic search of the literature. Data on clinical and methodological characteristics of the included systematic reviews were extracted. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed using the overview quality assessment questionnaire, a validated 10-item quality assessment tool. We compared the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in regular journals with that of Cochrane systematic reviews.
Results:
We included 117 systematic reviews, 99 systematic reviews published in regular journals and 18 Cochrane systematic reviews. The average methodological quality of systematic reviews was low for all ten items, but the quality of Cochrane systematic reviews was significantly higher than systematic reviews published in regular journals. On a 1-7 scale, the median overall quality score for all systematic reviews was 2 (range 1-7), with a score of 1 (range 1-7) for systematic reviews in regular journals compared to 6 (range 3-7) in Cochrane systematic reviews (p<0.001).
Conclusion:
Most systematic reviews in the field of pediatric oncology seem to have serious methodological flaws leading to a high risk of bias. While Cochrane systematic reviews were of higher methodological quality than systematic reviews in regular journals, some of them also had methodological problems. Therefore, the methodology of each individual systematic review should be scrutinized before accepting its results.
Insights
Systematic reviews in pediatric oncology often have methodological flaws, increasing bias risk. Cochrane reviews show higher quality than regular journal reviews, but scrutiny is still needed.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Systematic Reviews
Background:
- Systematic reviews are crucial for evidence-based decision-making in pediatric oncology.
- The methodological quality of existing systematic reviews in this field requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the methodological quality of all available systematic reviews in pediatric oncology.
- To compare the quality of systematic reviews published in regular journals versus Cochrane reviews.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search identified eligible systematic reviews.
- The Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (10 items) was used to assess methodological quality.
- Data on clinical and methodological characteristics were extracted.
Main Results:
- 117 systematic reviews were included (99 regular, 18 Cochrane).
- Overall methodological quality was low across all reviews, with a median score of 2/7.
- Cochrane reviews (median 6/7) demonstrated significantly higher quality than regular journal reviews (median 1/7).
Conclusions:
- Many systematic reviews in pediatric oncology suffer from significant methodological flaws, leading to a high risk of bias.
- While Cochrane reviews are superior, they can also exhibit methodological issues.
- Individual systematic review methodologies must be critically evaluated before accepting findings.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children