Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Forces and moments on posterior teeth generated by incisor intrusion biomechanics
I Sifakakis1, N Pandis, M Makou
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Objectives:
To comparatively evaluate the extrusive forces and torquing moments on the posterior dentition generated during anterior intrusion with different intrusion techniques in the maxillary and mandibular dental arch.
Material And Methods:
Seven wire specimens were used for each of the following intrusive arches: Utility arch 0.016 x 0.016' Blue Elgiloy, Utility arch 0.017 x 0.025' TMA and Burstone Intrusion arch 0.017 x 0.025' TMA. The wires were inserted on bracketed dental arches constructed on maxillary Frasaco models, segmented mesially to the maxillary canines. Simulated intrusion from 0.0-3.0 mm was performed on the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS). The forces and moments were recorded in all three planes of space at 0.1 mm increments and the values at 3.0 mm for all wires were used for all statistical evaluations. The data were analyzed, separately for the forces and moments, by means of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with forces and moments serving as the dependent variables and intrusion technique and jaw (maxilla or mandible) as the independent variable. Post hoc multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey test at .05 error rate.
Results:
The 0.016 x 0.016' Blue Elgiloy utility arch exerted the highest posterior extrusive forces, 15% higher than the 0.017 x 0.025' TMA utility and 40% higher in comparison with the 0.017 x 0.025' TMA Burstone intrusion arch.The lowest posterior moment in the sagittal plane was generated by the 0.017 x 0.025' TMA Burstone intrusion arch. The 0.016 x 0.016' Blue Elgiloy utility arch exerted 15% higher posterior moments and the 0.017 x 0.025' TMA utility 25% higher. Forces and moments were consistently larger for the mandible compared to the maxilla for the same intrusion technique.
Conclusions:
The upper Burstone 0.017 x 0.025' TMA intrusion arch exerted the lowest forces/moments on posterior teeth. The highest forces were generated by the 0.016 x 0.016-inch Blue Elgiloy utility arch and the highest moments by the lower 0.017 x 0.025-inch TMA utility arch.
Related Concept Videos
Resultant Moment: Scalar Formulation
To determine the resultant moment, the moments caused by all the forces in a system in the x-y plane are considered. Positive moments are typically...
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or grinding food.
Principle of Moments
The moment is calculated by multiplying the magnitude of the force by the perpendicular distance from the point of application to the point about...
Upward Impending Motion
To better comprehend how a screw jack functions, consider the completely unraveled thread as a block in contact with the...
Moment of a Force: Vector Formulation
The vector formulation of the moment of force is the cross-product of the position and force vectors. The...
Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...

