Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Translation in Prokaryotes01:29

Translation in Prokaryotes

Prokaryote translation is a complex, highly coordinated process that converts genetic information from mRNA into functional proteins. It involves three stages: initiation, elongation, and termination, each facilitated by specific molecular components.Initiation of TranslationThe process begins with the assembly of the ribosomal subunits and initiation factors on the mRNA. In bacteria, the 30S ribosomal subunit recognizes the Shine-Dalgarno sequence in the mRNA, a conserved region upstream of...
Initiation of Translation02:33

Initiation of Translation

Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Initiation of Translation02:33

Initiation of Translation

Initiating translation is complex because it involves multiple molecules. Initiator tRNA, ribosomal subunits, and eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) are all required to assemble on the initiation codon of mRNA. This process consists of several steps that are mediated by different eIFs.
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Ribosome Profiling02:24

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique helps...
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R stands for...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immunity-and-matrix-regulatory cells promote hyaline-like cartilage repair in osteoarthritis.

Bioactive materials·2026
Same author

Symbolic Participation or Substantial Learning Behavior? A PSM-Based Comparison Between Honors and Non-Honors Undergraduates from Two Top Elite Universities in China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Novel Inflammatory Biomarkers for Poor Ovarian Response Detected by Follicular Fluid Olink Proteomics.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Orientated reception-emission of electrons at Fe single atoms driving emerging contaminants decomposition via Fe-O/C d-pπ conjugated effect.

Journal of hazardous materials·2026
Same author

Host factors in parainfluenza virus replication: from entry to innate immunity evasion.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Tailoring vanadium-doped carbon dots as a peroxidase mimic for precise colorimetric sensing of myricetin.

Mikrochimica acta·2026
Same journal

The male-biased sex ratio in humans and its role in the transition from promiscuity to pair bonding.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the counter-intuitive effects of vaccination by coupling the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 and the evolution of human behaviors.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A hybrid reaction-diffusion and mechanical stimulus model for mandibular bone remodeling under chewing and vibratory loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Joint likelihood-free inference of the number of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms and their selection coefficients in an evolving population.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

De novo Identification of Actively Translated Open Reading Frames with Ribosome Profiling Data
08:23

De novo Identification of Actively Translated Open Reading Frames with Ribosome Profiling Data

Published on: February 18, 2022

Identifying translation initiation sites in prokaryotes using support vector machine.

Tingting Gao1, Zhixia Yang, Yong Wang

  • 1College of Science, China Agricultural University, 100083 Beijing, China.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|October 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a supervised learning method using support vector machines (SVM) to accurately identify translation initiation sites (TIS) in prokaryotic genomes. The new approach outperforms existing methods, reducing false positives in gene prediction.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Immunofluorescence to Measure Global Localized Translation
09:13

Quantitative Immunofluorescence to Measure Global Localized Translation

Published on: August 22, 2017

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing
12:05

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing

Published on: August 7, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

De novo Identification of Actively Translated Open Reading Frames with Ribosome Profiling Data
08:23

De novo Identification of Actively Translated Open Reading Frames with Ribosome Profiling Data

Published on: February 18, 2022

Quantitative Immunofluorescence to Measure Global Localized Translation
09:13

Quantitative Immunofluorescence to Measure Global Localized Translation

Published on: August 22, 2017

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing
12:05

RIBO-seq in Bacteria: a Sample Collection and Library Preparation Protocol for NGS Sequencing

Published on: August 7, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Gene identification is crucial for understanding prokaryotic genomes.
  • Existing methods for predicting translation initiation sites (TIS) often yield high false positive rates.
  • Unsupervised learning frameworks limit the accuracy and organism-specific applicability of current TIS prediction tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a supervised learning method for accurate genome-level TIS identification.
  • To improve gene prediction by minimizing false positives in TIS identification.
  • To create a robust TIS prediction tool applicable across diverse bacterial genomes.

Main Methods:

  • Implemented a supervised learning approach using Support Vector Machines (SVM).
  • Extracted sequence features by modeling TIS regions with a Position Specific Weight Matrix (PSWM).
  • Trained SVM parameters using curated positive and negative TIS datasets.

Main Results:

  • Accurately identified TIS in E. coli and B. subtilis.
  • Validated the method on GC-rich genomes (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243).
  • Demonstrated superior performance compared to four existing TIS prediction methods across all tested organisms.

Conclusions:

  • The SVM-based method accurately identifies TIS at the genome level, regardless of GC content.
  • This approach significantly improves upon existing methods for TIS prediction in prokaryotes.
  • The developed method offers a more reliable tool for gene identification in bacterial genomics.