Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Immediate truth--temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of
Sascha Topolinski1, Rolf Reber
1Department of Psychology II, Social Psychology, University of Wuerzburg, Roentgenring 10, 97070 Wuerzburg, Germany. sascha.topolinski@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
Cognition
|October 23, 2009
Summary
Faster solution presentation increases perceived accuracy, even for incorrect answers. This temporal contiguity effect influences cognitive problem-solving judgments.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Decision Making
Background:
- The experience of veracity, or truthfulness, is crucial for cognitive processing.
- Existing research has not fully explored the temporal dynamics influencing veracity judgments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the temporal contiguity hypothesis, which posits that faster solution presentation enhances perceived correctness.
- To investigate the impact of onset latency on veracity judgments across different cognitive tasks.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Varied onset times (50 ms vs. 150 ms) for anagram solutions.
- Experiment 2: Replicated findings with mathematical equations and reversed problem-solution presentation (0 ms vs. 50 ms).
- Experiment 3: Examined the linear relationship between onset delay (50 ms, 150 ms, 300 ms) and accuracy judgments for insight problems.
Main Results:
- Faster appearing solutions were more frequently judged as correct, irrespective of actual correctness.
- This effect persisted even when participants were unaware of the onset delay differences.
- A linear decrease in judged probability of correctness was observed with increasing onset delay.
Conclusions:
- Temporal contiguity significantly influences the subjective experience of veracity.
- Cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms may underlie this temporal bias in judgment.
- The findings have implications for understanding decision-making and problem-solving processes.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Learning
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Problem-Solving
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Counterfactual Thinking
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Cognitivism
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...

