Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

09:03
Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS)
Michael C Summers1, Andrew D Foland
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA. michael_c_summers@comcast.net
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
|October 23, 2009
Summary
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) effectiveness for day 3 embryos depends heavily on embryo count and aneuploidy rates. Statistical analysis reveals that PGS may offer marginal benefits or even be detrimental, highlighting the need for careful consideration of individual patient data.
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Medicine
- Biostatistics
- Genetics
Background:
- Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is a technique used in assisted reproductive technology to assess the chromosomal status of embryos before uterine transfer.
- The efficacy of PGS, particularly for day 3 cleavage stage embryos, remains a subject of ongoing research and debate.
- Understanding the statistical impact of PGS is crucial for optimizing its application in clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To statistically analyze the impact of performing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) on a cohort of day 3 cleavage stage embryos using hypergeometric probability.
- To determine the statistical framework for evaluating the limits of PGS based on the number of available day 3 embryos for biopsy.
Main Methods:
- Statistical mathematical modeling was employed to analyze the data.
- Hypergeometric probability statistics were utilized to assess the impact of PGS.
Main Results:
- The benefit of PGS is significantly influenced by the number of available day 3 embryos for biopsy.
- Aneuploidy rates, mosaicism rates, and the probability of mosaic embryos testing as normal are critical hidden variables affecting PGS outcomes.
- Many combinations of embryo numbers and aneuploidy/mosaicism rates result in marginal benefits or even detrimental outcomes from PGS.
- Increased PGS error rates rapidly diminish its discriminatory information capability.
Conclusions:
- A statistical framework was established to define the limitations of PGS for a given number of day 3 embryos.
- PGS cannot be universally recommended a priori due to statistical uncertainties in key quantitative parameters influencing clinical outcomes.
- The decision to use PGS should be individualized, considering the specific statistical variables relevant to each clinical situation.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Nondisjunction
Nondisjunction is the failure of homologous chromosomes or sister chromatids to separate correctly and move to the opposite poles of the cells. This produces daughter cells with abnormal chromosome numbers. Nondisjunction is common during anaphase I or anaphase II of meiosis. Mutations in synaptonemal complex proteins that attach homologous chromosomes increase the chances of nondisjunction in anaphase I of meiosis I. In contrast, mutations in topoisomerases and condensins that hold sister...

