Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary Care, Specialists, and Hospitals: Bridging the Gaps in Communication and Coordination.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Subjective cognitive decline prevalence, impacts, and discussions with healthcare professionals among middle-aged and older women veterans and non-veterans, 2021-2022.

Aging & mental health·2026
Same author

Perspectives on increasing corporate ownership and unionization in hospital medicine: An exploratory mixed methods study.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same author

From Challenges to Solutions: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Inter-hospital Transfer Processes.

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same author

The Silent Service: Identifying Under-Recognized Young Military Caregivers.

Military medicine·2025
Same author

Caregiver recruitment and engagement: identifying best practices and strategies for including family caregivers of veterans in health services research.

BMC health services research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials.

Luci K Leykum1, Jacqueline A Pugh, Holly J Lanham

  • 1VERDICT, a VA HSR&D REAP at the South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA. Leykum@uthscsa.edu

Implementation Science : IS
|October 27, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Implementation research bridges the gap between effective treatments and healthcare delivery. This study integrates participatory action research and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to improve intervention implementation in complex healthcare settings.

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare research methodology
  • Implementation science
  • Health services research

Background:

  • A significant gap exists between evidence-based practices and their application in routine healthcare.
  • Implementation research aims to reduce this gap by studying how to integrate effective interventions into practice.
  • Healthcare organizations present unique challenges to standard interventional approaches due to inherent variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the integration of participatory action research and randomized controlled trial (RCT) study designs.
  • To propose a novel approach for studying healthcare interventions that accommodates organizational complexity.
  • To address the tension between generalizable knowledge and context-specific healthcare realities.

Main Methods:

  • Summarizing key elements of participatory action research, emphasizing its collaborative and reflective nature.
  • Discussing and contrasting participatory action research with traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) designs.
  • Utilizing a complex adaptive systems framework to guide the integration of these methodologies.

Main Results:

  • The integration of participatory action research and RCT designs offers a new methodological approach.
  • This combined approach acknowledges the complex, adaptive nature of healthcare organizations.
  • It facilitates the generation of generalizable knowledge about intervention implementation processes.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed integrated approach enhances the study of healthcare interventions.
  • It balances the need for rigorous, generalizable findings with the realities of diverse healthcare settings.
  • This methodology supports more effective and sustainable implementation of evidence-based practices.