Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

3D Whole-heart Myocardial Tissue Analysis
Published on: April 12, 2017
Volume-targeted and whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography using an intravascular contrast agent
Lijun Tang1, Nico Merkle, Michael Schär
1Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Insights
Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (WH-CMRA) offers improved visualization of coronary artery length and side branches compared to volume-targeted coronary MRA (t-CMRA). Both techniques provide comparable image quality for coronary MRA after intravascular contrast agent administration.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Resonance Technology
Background:
- Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is crucial for non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease.
- Intravascular contrast agents enhance MRA visualization of coronary arteries.
- Comparing different MRA acquisition strategies is essential for optimizing diagnostic accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of volume-targeted coronary MRA (t-CMRA) and whole-heart coronary MRA (WH-CMRA) for visualizing coronary arteries.
- To evaluate image quality parameters, including vessel length and side branch visibility, between the two MRA techniques.
- To assess the impact of intravascular contrast agents on coronary MRA performance.
Main Methods:
- Six healthy subjects underwent both t-CMRA and WH-CMRA using a navigator-gated, free-breathing, cardiac-triggered 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence.
- An intravascular contrast agent (B-22956) was administered prior to both imaging sequences.
- Image quality was assessed by maximal visible vessel length, vessel sharpness, and visibility of coronary side branches.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in overall image quality were found between t-CMRA and WH-CMRA.
- WH-CMRA demonstrated significantly longer visible segments in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX).
- WH-CMRA showed a significantly higher number of visible side branches for the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) compared to t-CMRA.
Conclusions:
- Both WH-CMRA and t-CMRA are effective coronary MRA techniques when using intravascular blood-pool agents.
- High spatial resolution WH-CMRA provides comparable vessel conspicuity to t-CMRA.
- WH-CMRA offers superior visualization of coronary vessel length and a greater number of visible side branches, enhancing diagnostic potential.
Purpose:
To compare volume-targeted and whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) after the administration of an intravascular contrast agent.
Materials And Methods:
Six healthy adult subjects underwent a navigator-gated and -corrected (NAV) free breathing volume-targeted cardiac-triggered inversion recovery (IR) 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) coronary MRA sequence (t-CMRA) (spatial resolution = 1 x 1 x 3 mm(3)) and high spatial resolution IR 3D SSFP whole-heart coronary MRA (WH-CMRA) (spatial resolution = 1 x 1 x 2 mm(3)) after the administration of an intravascular contrast agent B-22956. Subjective and objective image quality parameters including maximal visible vessel length, vessel sharpness, and visibility of coronary side branches were evaluated for both t-CMRA and WH-CMRA.
Results:
No significant differences (P = NS) in image quality were observed between contrast-enhanced t-CMRA and WH-CMRA. However, using an intravascular contrast agent, significantly longer vessel segments were measured on WH-CMRA vs. t-CMRA (right coronary artery [RCA] 13.5 +/- 0.7 cm vs. 12.5 +/- 0.2 cm; P < 0.05; and left circumflex coronary artery [LCX] 11.9 +/- 2.2 cm vs. 6.9 +/- 2.4 cm; P < 0.05). Significantly more side branches (13.3 +/- 1.2 vs. 8.7 +/- 1.2; P < 0.05) were visible for the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) on WH-CMRA vs. t-CMRA. Scanning time and navigator efficiency were similar for both techniques (t-CMRA: 6.05 min; 49% vs. WH-CMRA: 5.51 min; 54%, both P = NS).
Conclusion:
Both WH-CMRA and t-CMRA using SSFP are useful techniques for coronary MRA after the injection of an intravascular blood-pool agent. However, the vessel conspicuity for high spatial resolution WH-CMRA is not inferior to t-CMRA, while visible vessel length and the number of visible smaller-diameter vessels and side-branches are improved.
More Related Videos
11:13Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
06:29Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT