Bevacizumab and ranibizumab on microvascular endothelial cells: A comparative study

Raquel Costa1, Angela Carneiro, Ana Rocha

  • 1Department of Biochemistry (U38-FCT), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.

Insights

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, both inhibit angiogenesis in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs). However, they exhibit distinct effects on cell proliferation, migration, and signaling pathways.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is crucial for angiogenesis and is a target for therapies like bevacizumab and ranibizumab.
  • Bevacizumab and ranibizumab are clinically used anti-VEGF agents, with distinct approved indications.
  • Understanding their comparative effects on endothelial cells is vital for optimizing therapeutic strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the in vitro effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab on human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs).
  • To investigate the impact of these anti-VEGF agents on cellular processes and signaling pathways.

Main Methods:

  • HMEC cultures were treated with bevacizumab or ranibizumab at clinically relevant concentrations.
  • Assays included MTS for cytotoxicity, TUNEL for apoptosis, BrdU for proliferation, transwell for migration, and Western blot for protein expression (VEGF, VEGFR-2, p-VEGFR-2, Akt, p-Akt, Erk, p-Erk).
  • VEGF levels in cell media were also analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Neither agent exhibited cytotoxicity. Both increased apoptosis and reduced proliferation, migration, and vascular structure formation.
  • Both decreased VEGF release, phosphorylated VEGFR-2, and phosphorylated Akt.
  • Bevacizumab uniquely reduced phosphorylated Erk, while ranibizumab showed a greater impact on proliferation, and bevacizumab on migration and capillary formation.

Conclusions:

  • Bevacizumab and ranibizumab demonstrate comparable anti-angiogenic actions in HMECs but with distinct molecular and cellular effects.
  • Differences in effects on proliferation, migration, and specific signaling pathways warrant further clinical investigation.
  • These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of agent-specific profiles in clinical applications.

Related Concept Videos