Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Terrorist suicide bombings: lessons learned in Metropolitan Haifa from September 2000 to January 2006
Michal Mekel1, Amir Bumenfeld, Zvi Feigenberg
1Rambam Medical Center, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Insights
A metropolitan triage system effectively managed suicide bombing victims, ensuring critically injured patients received appropriate care. Level II trauma centers successfully treated severe blast injuries, demonstrating their capability in mass casualty incidents.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Trauma Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Suicide bombing attacks present a significant global challenge for medical facilities, classifying as multiple casualty incidents (MCI).
- Effective management strategies are crucial for handling the high volume and severity of casualties from such events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the medical management of victims from suicide bombing attacks.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of trauma center utilization and triage systems in mass casualty incidents.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of medical data from six suicide bombing attacks in Metropolitan Haifa (2000-2006).
- Review of victim demographics, injury severity, and treatment pathways across different trauma center levels.
Main Results:
- 411 victims were recorded, with 69 fatalities (16.8%).
- Of 342 injured, 31 were severely injured (9.1%), with 8 deaths occurring at the Level I trauma center.
- Level II trauma centers reported no in-hospital mortality for severely injured patients, with some requiring secondary transfer.
Conclusions:
- A predetermined metropolitan triage system is vital for optimizing care during mass casualty incidents, preventing Level I center overcrowding.
- Level II trauma centers can effectively manage severe blast injuries, including those with significant pulmonary damage, comparable to Level I centers.
Background:
The threat of suicide bombing attacks has become a worldwide problem. This special type of multiple casualty incidents (MCI) seriously challenges the most experienced medical facilities.
Methods:
The authors concluded a retrospective analysis of the medical management of victims from the six suicide bombing attacks that occurred in Metropolitan Haifa from 2000 to 2006.
Results:
The six terrorist suicide bombing attacks resulted in 411 victims with 69 dead (16.8 percent) and 342 injured. Of the 342 injured, there were 31 (9.1 percent) severely injured, seven (2.4 percent) moderately severely injured, and 304 (88.9 percent) mildly injured patients. Twenty four (77 percent) of the 31 severely injured victims were evacuated to the level I trauma center at Rambam Medical Center (RMC). Of the seven severely injured victims who were evacuated to the level II trauma centers (Bnai-Zion Medical Center and Carmel Medical Center) because of proximity to the detonation site, three were secondarily transferred to RMC after initial resuscitation. Eight of the 24 severely injured casualties, admitted to RMC, eventually died of their wounds. There was no in-hospital mortality in the level II trauma centers.
Conclusions:
A predetermined metropolitan triage system which directs trauma victims of a MCI to the appropriate medical center and prevents overcrowding of the level I facility with less severe injured patients will assure that critically injured patients of a suicide bombing attack will receive a level of care that is comparable with the care given to similar patients under normal circumstances. Severe blast injury victims without penetrating injuries but with significant pulmonary damage can be effectively managed in ICUs of level II trauma centers.
Related Concept Videos
Inhalation Anthrax
Flashbulb Memory
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
The Availability Heuristic
Hazard Rate

