Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Why, how and when do we need to optimize the setting of cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Matteo Bertini1, Victoria Delgado, Jeroen J Bax
1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands. m.bertini@lumc.nl
Optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device settings, including atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays, is crucial for maximizing left ventricular (LV) performance. This review explores current evidence-based methods for AV and VV interval optimization in CRT.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) utilizes adjustable atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) timings to enhance left ventricular (LV) function.
- Current CRT device optimization strategies lack universal consensus, with varying methodologies proposed.
- Physiological states like rest and exercise significantly alter LV loading, potentially requiring dynamic adjustments to optimal AV and VV intervals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing methodologies for optimizing AV and VV intervals in CRT devices.
- To discuss the rationale, timing, and practical application of AV and VV interval optimization based on current evidence.
- To provide an overview of findings from multicenter trials focused on AV and VV interval optimization.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of current echocardiographic and non-echocardiographic methods for AV and VV interval optimization.
- Analysis of evidence supporting different optimization techniques.
- Synthesis of data from multicenter clinical trials on CRT timing optimization.
Main Results:
- Multiple methods exist for AV and VV interval optimization, but no single approach is universally adopted.
- LV loading conditions vary between rest and exercise, impacting optimal timing settings.
- Multicenter trials provide valuable insights into the efficacy of various AV and VV optimization strategies.
Conclusions:
- Standardized protocols for AV and VV interval optimization in CRT are needed.
- Optimization strategies should consider patient-specific physiology and varying conditions like exercise.
- Further research and consensus are required to refine CRT programming for improved patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

