Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Mechanism of Kemeng Fang's Inhibition of Podocyte Apoptosis in Rats with Membranous Nephropathy through the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway
Published on: August 23, 2024
Optimal blood pressure control versus additional immunosuppressive therapy in idiopathic membranous nephropathy - a
R Dikow1, P Quentmeier, V Schwenger
1Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. ralfdikow@yahoo.de
The treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) with nephrotic syndrome comprises immunosuppressive therapy and antihypertensive treatment with the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Given the relatively benign natural history of MN, an immunosuppressive-free therapeutic regimen should be considered as the primary treatment option. In a single-center, retrospective analysis we compared the outcome of 54 patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MN 12, 24 and 60 months after initiation of therapy. All patients had RAS-blocking agents and 36 patients received additionally an immunosuppressive regimen. In both groups the patients initially had a nephrotic proteinuria (median 8.7 vs. 6.0 g/day, n.s.). Median blood pressure reduction was comparable after 12, 24 and 60 months in both groups. The median evolution of proteinuria during therapy after 12, 24 and 60 months was 3.4, 1.7 and 1.1 g/day in the group with immunosuppression compared to 3.0, 1.1 and 0.32 g/day in the non-immunosuppressive group. After 60 months no patient developed endstage renal failure. The number of severe side effects was significantly higher in patients with immunosuppression. Regarding renal function and reduction of proteinuria, patients with idiopathic MN treated without immunosuppressive therapy but with measures to ensure optimal blood pressure control and the full blockade of RAS had a similar outcome after 60 months as compared to patients who received additional immunosuppressive therapy.
The treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) with nephrotic syndrome comprises immunosuppressive therapy and antihypertensive treatment with the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Given the relatively benign natural history of MN, an immunosuppressive-free therapeutic regimen should be considered as the primary treatment option. In a single-center, retrospective analysis we compared the outcome of 54 patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic MN 12, 24 and 60 months after initiation of therapy. All patients had RAS-blocking agents and 36 patients received additionally an immunosuppressive regimen. In both groups the patients initially had a nephrotic proteinuria (median 8.7 vs. 6.0 g/day, n.s.). Median blood pressure reduction was comparable after 12, 24 and 60 months in both groups. The median evolution of proteinuria during therapy after 12, 24 and 60 months was 3.4, 1.7 and 1.1 g/day in the group with immunosuppression compared to 3.0, 1.1 and 0.32 g/day in the non-immunosuppressive group. After 60 months no patient developed endstage renal failure. The number of severe side effects was significantly higher in patients with immunosuppression. Regarding renal function and reduction of proteinuria, patients with idiopathic MN treated without immunosuppressive therapy but with measures to ensure optimal blood pressure control and the full blockade of RAS had a similar outcome after 60 months as compared to patients who received additional immunosuppressive therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Nephrotic Syndrome III : Nursing Management
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management