Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Peer review and refereeing in medicine and medical sciences
1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Asir Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract:
Every academic scientist will come into contact with peer review process either as a reviewer of others work, or as an author whose work is being reviewed by others, or as an applicant for research grant. Historically, peer review process came at various times to various journals for a variety of reasons in haphazard manner. Many forms of criticisms have been made against the process of peer review, and some critics do not believe that the process prevents the publication of flawed articles and fraudulent research. Despite the criticisms, there are advantages of peer review. At present in medical journalism peer review process is an indispensable entity for assessing manuscripts intended for publication.
Related Concept Videos
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Proofreading
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Improving Translational Accuracy
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
