Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

08:13
Optimized Interferon-gamma ELISpot Assay to Measure T Cell Responses in the Guinea Pig Model after Vaccination
Published on: January 20, 2019
INTRADERMAL VERSUS SUBCUTANEOUS IMMUNIZATION OF MONKEYS AGAINST POLIOMYELITIS
1Laboratories of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
|October 30, 2009
Summary
Injecting live poliomyelitis virus into monkey skin or under the skin offers protection against later brain infections. Intradermal injections provide greater protection than subcutaneous ones, with no observed side effects.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Poliomyelitis virus poses a significant threat, necessitating effective immunization strategies.
- Understanding the protective mechanisms of early poliomyelitis virus exposure is crucial for vaccine development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the protective efficacy of intradermal and subcutaneous inoculation of live poliomyelitis virus in monkeys.
- To compare the degree of protection offered by different routes of administration.
- To assess the correlation between in vitro viral neutralization and in vivo protection.
Main Methods:
- Monkeys were inoculated with live poliomyelitis virus via intradermal and subcutaneous routes.
- Protected animals were subsequently challenged with intracerebral inoculation of poliomyelitis virus.
- Serum samples were analyzed for viral neutralization capacity in vitro.
Main Results:
- Intradermal and subcutaneous inoculation of poliomyelitis virus conferred protection against subsequent intracerebral challenge.
- Intradermal inoculation resulted in a greater degree of protection compared to subcutaneous inoculation.
- No local or systemic pathological signs were observed following the initial inoculations.
- Serum neutralization of poliomyelitis virus in vitro was a more sensitive indicator of immunity than intracerebral inoculation challenge.
Conclusions:
- Intradermal and subcutaneous administration of live poliomyelitis virus can induce a protective immune response in monkeys.
- The route of administration significantly influences the level of protection achieved.
- In vitro serum neutralization is a more reliable measure of poliomyelitis virus immunity than direct intracerebral challenge.
Related Concept Videos
Poliomyelitis
Poliomyelitis is caused by poliovirus, a small, non-enveloped, positive-sense RNA virus of the Picornaviridae family and Enterovirus genus. Transmission occurs primarily via the fecal-oral route, often through ingestion of contaminated water or food. The virus initially replicates in the oropharynx and intestinal mucosa, particularly in lymphoid tissues such as the tonsils, Peyer’s patches, and regional lymph nodes. Primary viremia follows, allowing dissemination throughout the body.In most...
Vaccinations
Overview
Vaccines
Vaccines are among the most effective tools in preventive medicine, designed to prepare the immune system to recognize and combat infectious agents. By introducing antigens—substances that the immune system identifies as foreign—vaccines stimulate an adaptive immune response that leads to immunological memory. This immunological memory enables the body to mount a faster and more effective response upon future exposures to the actual pathogen.Vaccines can be categorized based on the type of...
Active versus Passive Immunity
Immunity, along with the ability to limit pathogen growth to prevent significant body tissue damage, can be gained either by (1) actively developing an immune response within the individual after exposure to a pathogen or after getting vaccinated or (2) passively transferring immune components from an immune individual to one who is nonimmune. Both these forms of immunity can be found naturally and in medical practices.
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...
