Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

09:28
Viral Concentration Determination Through Plaque Assays: Using Traditional and Novel Overlay Systems
Published on: November 4, 2014
INTERFERENCE BETWEEN VIRUSES IN TISSUE CULTURE.
1Service for Studies and Research in Yellow Fever, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
The Journal of Experimental Medicine
|October 30, 2009
Summary
The 17DD High strain of yellow fever virus inhibits the growth of other viruses, including West Nile virus and influenza A virus, in tissue cultures. This viral interference was observed in one direction only.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Cell Biology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Viral interference is a phenomenon where one virus affects the replication of another.
- Understanding viral interference mechanisms is crucial for developing antiviral strategies and vaccines.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of one virus on the growth of another in tissue culture.
- To determine the extent of viral interference caused by the 17DD High strain of yellow fever virus against other viruses.
Main Methods:
- Tissue culture experiments were performed to assess viral growth.
- Different virus strains, including yellow fever virus (17DD High and Asibi strains), West Nile virus, Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus, and influenza A virus, were used.
- Viral suppression was evaluated based on the quantity of inoculated viruses.
Main Results:
- The 17DD High strain of yellow fever virus completely suppressed the growth of the Asibi strain of yellow fever virus and West Nile virus.
- Both 17DD High yellow fever virus and West Nile virus partially or completely suppressed Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus growth.
- These viruses also suppressed influenza A virus growth, but reciprocal interference was not demonstrable.
- No neutralizing antibodies or non-specific antiviral substances were detected in cultures infected with 17DD High yellow fever virus.
Conclusions:
- The 17DD High strain of yellow fever virus exhibits significant antiviral activity against a range of viruses in vitro.
- The observed viral interference is primarily unidirectional, with limited evidence of reciprocal effects.
- The mechanism of interference does not appear to involve neutralizing antibodies or non-specific antiviral substances.

