Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gallstone lithotripsy: relevant physical principles and technical issues.

W J Davros1, B S Garra, R K Zeman

  • 1Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007-2197.

Radiology
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Single-energy non-contrast hepatic steatosis criteria applied to virtual non-contrast images: is it still highly specific and positively predictive?

Clinical radiology·2018
Same author

Contrast Study of CdZnTe Detectors for Digital Mammography.

Journal of X-ray science and technology·2011
Same author

Optimization of Cd1-xZnxTe Detectors for Digital Radiography.

Journal of X-ray science and technology·2011
Same author

Cumulative radiation dose during hospitalization for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2010
Same author

Three-dimensional computed tomographic volume rendering techniques in endoscopic thoracoplasty.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2003
Same author

Spiral CT scanning technique in the detection of aspiration of LEGO foreign bodies.

Pediatric radiology·2001
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Radiologists performing gallstone lithotripsy need to understand shock wave generation. This involves spark-gap, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric methods, their tissue interactions, and stone fragmentation mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Acoustics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Gallstone lithotripsy relies on shock waves for stone fragmentation.
  • Understanding shock wave physics is crucial for effective and safe procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the fundamental principles of shock wave generation for gallstone lithotripsy.
  • To compare different shock wave generator types and their clinical relevance.

Main Methods:

  • Review of shock wave physics, including rapid rise time and pressure components.
  • Description and comparison of spark-gap, electromagnetic, and piezoelectric shock wave generators.
  • Analysis of shock wave interactions with biological tissues.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Shock waves possess unique properties: rapid pressure rise, high compressive forces, and a rarefactive component.
  • Three primary generator types exist, each with distinct mechanisms.
  • Common tissue interactions and proposed stone fragmentation mechanisms are identified.

Conclusions:

  • Knowledge of shock wave generation and properties is essential for radiologists.
  • Understanding generator types aids in equipment selection for lithotripsy.
  • Further research into tissue interactions and fragmentation mechanisms is warranted.