Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Trifluoperazine binding to mutant calmodulins.

L R Massom1, T J Lukas, A Persechini

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38168.

Biochemistry
|January 22, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phosphorylation Regulates Interaction of 210-kDa Myosin Light Chain Kinase N-terminal Domain with Actin Cytoskeleton.

Biochemistry. Biokhimiia·2015
Same author

Effect of fluoxetine on disease progression in a mouse model of ALS.

Journal of neurophysiology·2014
Same author

Purification and characterization of transcription factors.

Mass spectrometry reviews·2013
Same author

Determination of immunoglobulin G in bovine colostrum and milk powders, and in dietary supplements of bovine origin by protein G affinity liquid chromatography: collaborative study.

Journal of AOAC International·2010
Same author

[Penetrating peptide inhibitor of the myosin light chain kinase suppresses hyperpermeability of vascular endothelium].

Rossiiskii fiziologicheskii zhurnal imeni I.M. Sechenova·2009
Same author

Myosin light chain kinase colocalizes with nonmuscle myosin IIB in myofibril precursors and sarcomeric Z-lines of cardiomyocytes.

Cell motility and the cytoskeleton·2006
Same journal

Aromatic Cage-Directed Azide-Methyllysine Photochemistry for Profiling Nonhistone Interacting Partners of the MeCP2 Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Differential Hydroxypyruvate Processing by <i>E. coli</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> DXP Synthases Reveals Preferential Xylulose 5-Phosphate Formation by the <i>P. aeruginosa</i> Enzyme.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Structural and Functional Characterization of Heterologous Nitrogenase Complexes.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Discovery of Bacterial Unspecific Peroxygenases.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Lactate Biology: Subcellular Routing and Chemical Form Define Function.

Biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Nature's Anaerobic Toolkit: Glycyl Radical Enzymes and Their Expanding Functional and Mechanistic Diversity.

Biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

Trifluoperazine (TFP) binding differs between vertebrate and bacterial calmodulin. Mutations in specific calmodulin regions significantly alter TFP binding capacity, revealing key structural roles in drug interaction.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Calmodulin (CaM) is a crucial calcium-binding protein involved in numerous cellular processes.
  • Trifluoperazine (TFP) is a drug known to bind calmodulin, with its binding stoichiometry varying across species.
  • Understanding TFP-CaM interactions provides insights into CaM structure-function relationships and drug mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the binding of trifluoperazine (TFP) to various calmodulin (CaM) variants.
  • To identify specific regions and mutations in CaM that influence TFP binding affinity and stoichiometry.
  • To elucidate the structural basis of TFP binding to CaM.

Main Methods:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis was used to create 12 altered calmodulin variants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Trifluoperazine (TFP) binding was quantified for wild-type and mutant calmodulins (CaMs).
  • Binding affinities and stoichiometries were determined for TFP-CaM interactions.
  • Main Results:

    • Escherichia coli-expressed wild-type calmodulins bind more TFP (approx. 5.0 equiv) than vertebrate calmodulin (approx. 4.2 equiv).
    • Conservative amino acid substitutions in wild-type E. coli calmodulins did not significantly alter TFP binding.
    • Specific mutations, particularly in the N-terminal helix, central helix, and a calcium-binding site, markedly affected TFP binding stoichiometry.

    Conclusions:

    • The N-terminal helix, central helix, and a calcium-binding site in calmodulin are critical for trifluoperazine (TFP) binding.
    • Structural integrity in these regions is essential for maintaining or inducing the correct conformation for TFP binding.
    • Differences in TFP binding between vertebrate and bacterial calmodulins may stem from variations in these key structural regions.