Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Left ventricular systolic dysfunction by itself does not influence outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation
Tom De Potter1, Antonio Berruezo, Lluis Mont
1Cardiology Department, Arrhythmia Section, Thorax Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Insights
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) does not predict atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation success. Left atrial diameter independently correlates with AF recurrence after ablation, regardless of LVEF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a common treatment for managing cardiac arrhythmias.
- Predicting recurrence after AF ablation is crucial for patient selection and management.
- The impact of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on AF ablation outcomes requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the influence of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation after a first procedure.
- To determine if pre-procedural LVEF impacts AF recurrence rates.
- To identify predictors of AF recurrence post-ablation.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study matched 36 patients with depressed LVEF to 36 controls with normal LVEF.
- Matching criteria included left atrial diameter (LAD), arterial hypertension, age, gender, and AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent).
- Survival analysis and Cox regression were used to assess AF recurrence and correlate it with clinical variables.
Main Results:
- Patients with depressed LVEF exhibited larger LV dimensions and lower LVEF compared to controls.
- No significant difference in AF recurrence rates was observed between depressed and normal LVEF groups after a mean follow-up of 16 months.
- Left atrial diameter (LAD) was the sole independent predictor of recurrence (OR 1.11, P = 0.03).
- A significant improvement in LVEF was noted in the depressed LVEF group at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, indicated by reduced LVEF, is not an independent predictor of AF ablation outcomes.
- Left atrial diameter is a significant independent correlate of AF recurrence, irrespective of LVEF.
- These findings suggest that LAD should be considered when assessing the likelihood of recurrence after AF ablation.
Aims:
The objective of the study was to analyse the influence of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) on the outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation after a first procedure. Pre-procedural predictors of recurrences after AF ablation can be useful for patient information and selection of candidates. The independent influence of LV systolic dysfunction on recurrence rate has not been studied.
Methods And Results:
A case-control study (1:1) was conducted with a total of 72 patients: 36 cases (depressed LVEF) and 36 controls (normal LVEF). Patients were matched by left atrial diameter (LAD), the presence of arterial hypertension, and other variables that might influence the results (age, gender and paroxysmal vs. persistent AF). There were no statistical differences in the variables used to perform the matching. Patients with depressed LVEF had higher LV end diastolic diameter (55.6 +/- 6.2 vs. 52.4 +/- 5.5, P = 0.03), higher LV end systolic diameter (40.3 +/- 6.9 vs. 32.6 +/- 4.3, P < 0.001), lower LVEF (41.4 +/- 8.0 vs. 63.1 +/- 5.5, P < 0.001) and were more likely to have structural heart disease. After a mean follow-up of 16 +/- 13 months, survival analysis for AF recurrences showed no differences between patients with depressed vs. normal LVEF (50.0 vs. 55.6%, log rank = 0.82). Cox regression analysis revealed LAD to be the only variable correlated to recurrence [OR 1.11 (1.01-1.22), P = 0.03]. Analysis at 6 months showed a significant increase in LVEF (43.23 +/- 7.61 to 51.12 +/- 13.53%, P = 0.01) for the case group.
Conclusion:
LV systolic dysfunction by itself is not a predictor of outcome after AF ablation. LAD independently correlates with outcome in patients with low or normal LVEF.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
10:46Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction