Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

09:00
Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing
Published on: August 16, 2024
Contrast reduction and reading: assessment and reliability with the Reading Explorer test
Giovanni Giacomelli1, Roberto Volpe, Gianni Virgili
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy. giovanni.giacomelli@unifi.it
European Journal of Ophthalmology
|November 3, 2009
Summary
The Reading Explorer (REX) test reliably measures reading speed, showing that reduced text contrast significantly impacts individuals with low vision. This effect is likely underestimated in everyday reading scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Vision Science
- Low Vision Research
Background:
- Text contrast reduction is a common challenge in reading materials.
- Understanding its impact on reading performance is crucial for individuals with visual impairments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of the Reading Explorer (REX) charts.
- To assess how decreased text contrast affects reading speed in people with normal and low vision.
Main Methods:
- Reading speed was measured using REX charts with reduced contrast (1.5 cycle/degree).
- Participants were grouped by visual acuity (logMAR 0.0-1.0).
- Standard visual acuity and contrast sensitivity tests were also performed.
Main Results:
- The REX test demonstrated good reliability for average reading speed and contrast threshold in low-vision groups.
- Approximately one-third of participants with 0.6 logMAR acuity and two-thirds with 1.0 logMAR acuity experienced a 20% reading speed loss with contrast reduction.
Conclusions:
- The negative impact of decreased text contrast on reading performance in low vision is likely underestimated.
- The REX test is a reliable tool for investigating the effects of contrast reduction on reading.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

