Related Experiment Videos
D-xylose absorption test. Urine or blood?
1Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Ichiloy Hospital, Israel.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
|February 1, 1991
Summary
The D-xylose absorption test assesses small intestine malabsorption. The 5-hour urine test is more accurate than the 1-hour blood test for evaluating intestinal absorption in adults.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Diagnostic Testing
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- The D-xylose absorption test is a long-standing method for diagnosing small intestine malabsorption.
- Debate exists regarding the optimal protocol: 1-hour blood test, 5-hour urine test, or combined approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of the 1-hour blood D-xylose test versus the 5-hour urine D-xylose test.
- To determine the most reliable method for assessing intestinal absorption.
Main Methods:
- A combined 1-hour blood and 5-hour urine D-xylose absorption test was performed on 111 patients.
- Results were categorized based on normal or abnormal values for both blood and urine tests.
- Further investigations including stool fat analysis and [14C]cholylglycine breath test were used to confirm malabsorption in specific patient groups.
Main Results:
- Normal xylose absorption was observed in both blood and urine tests in 56.8% of patients.
- Abnormal results in both tests occurred in 23.2% of patients.
- A significant proportion (19.2%) showed normal blood xylose but abnormal urine xylose, with confirmed fat/bile salt malabsorption in 87.5% of this subgroup.
Conclusions:
- The 5-hour urine D-xylose test appears to be a more accurate reflection of intestinal absorption in adults compared to the 1-hour blood test.
- Discrepancies between blood and urine tests highlight the importance of considering the urine test for comprehensive malabsorption evaluation.