Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Knowledge Model for the Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2024
Same author

Information Models Offer Value to Standardize Electronic Health Record Flowsheet Data: A Fall Prevention Exemplar.

Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing·2021
Same author

A refined methodology for validation of information models derived from flowsheet data and applied to a genitourinary case.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2020
Same author

Machine Learned Mapping of Local EHR Flowsheet Data to Standard Information Models using Topic Model Filtering.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2020
Same author

Knowledge Discovery With Machine Learning for Hospital-Acquired Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2019
Same author

A Framework for Visualizing Data Quality for Predictive Models and Clinical Quality Measures.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Data management for intervention effectiveness research: comparing deductive and inductive approaches.

Karen A Monsen1, Bonnie L Westra, Fang Yu

  • 1University of Minnesota School of Nursing, 5-160 Weaver-Densford Hall, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Research in Nursing & Health
|November 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Preparing intervention data for research requires effective management. Four approaches were tested on Omaha System data, yielding distinct classifications for future outcomes evaluation.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Nursing Research
  • Data Management

Background:

  • Effective management of intervention data is crucial for research.
  • The Omaha System is a widely used standardized classification for nursing interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate four distinct management approaches for classifying Omaha System intervention data.
  • To determine the suitability of these approaches for creating research-ready datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Four management approaches were applied to 621,385 interventions from 15 home care agencies.
  • Approaches included deductive methods (action category, theoretical, clinical expert consensus) and one inductive, data-driven method.

Main Results:

  • Deductive approaches yielded 4, 5, and 23 distinct groups, respectively.
  • The inductive approach generated 150 groups, with 24 identified as meaningful and unique.
  • Inductive groups were overlapping and captured diverse actions for multiple problems.

Conclusions:

  • All four management approaches successfully created meaningful intervention groups.
  • The choice of approach impacts the number and nature of intervention classifications.
  • These classified datasets are suitable for future outcomes evaluation studies.