Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolution of New Traits in Microbes01:24

Evolution of New Traits in Microbes

Microorganisms evolve rapidly due to their large population sizes and short generation times, often exhibiting measurable changes within days under laboratory conditions. Natural selection acts on standing genetic variation, enabling the retention and amplification of beneficial traits that confer fitness advantages in changing environments.Adaptive Pigment Regulation in RhodobacterIn Rhodobacter, a genus of purple non-sulfur bacteria, light-harvesting pigments such as bacteriochlorophyll and...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Provocation of occupational asthma by non-specific irritation and its relevance for the classification of chemicals as respiratory allergens: a case study of methyl methacrylate.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

Derivation of a Point of Departure using NAMs for application in Quantitative Risk Assessment of fragrance materials.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2026
Same author

Occupational asthma: dust exposure as a contributory factor and implications for classification of respiratory sensitisers.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

An extended Reference Chemical Potency List (RCPL) for characterising the performance of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in measuring the skin sensitisation potency of fragrance chemicals.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Accurate regulatory classification of chemical respiratory allergens: The case for robust characterisation of causation.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Comment regarding: 'On the solubility of azodicarbonamide in water/DMSO mixtures: an experimental and computational study' (2024), by Macetti <i>et al.</i>

Royal Society open science·2024
Same journal

Toxicity assessment of nanocosmetics: techniques and necessity for safety evaluation.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the interrelationship between inflammatory markers, rosacea, ocular symptoms, and migraine comorbidity.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of sun-protective behaviors in geriatric patients with and without skin cancer.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2026
Same journal

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) induces AhR-dependent proinflammatory responses and reactive oxygen species production in human conjunctival epithelial cells.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2026
Same journal

Effects of a topical zinc oxide-<i>Momordica charantia</i> oil formulation on wound healing in diabetic and non-diabetic rats.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2026
Same journal

The development of a computational model for predicting sensitization potential in cosmetics.

Cutaneous and ocular toxicology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

The evolution of validation: a commentary.

David A Basketter, Ian Kimber, Thomas Hartung

    Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
    |November 4, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Validation of new toxicity testing methods is crucial for reducing animal use. Understanding method strengths, limitations, and applicability, alongside expert input, accelerates progress, though regulatory acceptance remains a hurdle.

    More Related Videos

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
    04:52

    Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

    Published on: February 3, 2023

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    Area of Science:

    • Toxicology
    • Regulatory Science
    • Method Validation

    Background:

    • The term "validation" in toxicology refers to assessing the reliability of new or proposed testing methods.
    • Historically, validation has been defined as determining the validity of a measuring device.
    • Progress in reducing animal testing relies on validating alternative methods.

    Discussion:

    • Enhanced validation involves understanding a method's strengths, limitations, and applicable chemical domains.
    • Incorporating expert opinion is vital for robust method assessment.
    • Regulatory bodies' reluctance to adopt new approaches outside established norms hinders progress.

    Key Insights:

    • Comprehensive understanding of a new toxicity test's performance characteristics is essential.
    • Expert judgment plays a significant role in validating novel toxicological approaches.
    • Overcoming regulatory inertia is critical for advancing animal-free toxicity testing.

    Outlook:

    • Future advancements in toxicology depend on the acceptance and implementation of validated alternative methods.
    • Regulatory frameworks need to adapt to facilitate the adoption of new, validated testing strategies.
    • Continued dialogue between scientists and regulators is necessary to accelerate the replacement of animal testing.