Related Experiment Videos
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of combination therapy and monotherapy for dyslipidemia
Mukul Sharma1, Mohammed T Ansari, Ahmed M Abou-Setta
1University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
Statin therapy effectively prevents vascular disease, but treatment targets are often not achieved.
Purpose:
To compare the benefits and harms of high-dose statin monotherapy with those of combination therapy in adults at high risk for coronary disease.
Data Sources:
English-language records from MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), and the Cochrane Library (third quarter of 2008).
Study Selection:
A reviewer screened records, and a second reviewer verified selection of randomized, controlled trials in adult patients that compared combinations of statins and bile-acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, or omega-3 fatty acids with statin monotherapy, as well as nonrandomized comparative studies that were longer than 24 weeks and reported clinical and harms outcomes.
Data Extraction:
Data were abstracted for studies by using standardized forms, and study quality was rated with a standardized scale and strength of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
Data Synthesis:
102 studies met eligibility criteria. The main analysis compared combination therapy with high-dose statin monotherapy in high-risk patients. Very-low-strength evidence showed that statin-ezetimibe (2 trials; n = 439) and statin-fibrate (1 trial; n = 166) combinations did not reduce mortality more than high-dose statin monotherapy. No trials compared the effect of combination therapy versus high-dose statin monotherapy on the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization procedures. Two statin-ezetimibe trials (n = 295) demonstrated higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment with combination therapy (odds ratio, 7.21 [95% CI, 4.30 to 12.08]). Trials in lower-risk patients did not show a difference in mortality.
Limitations:
Studies were generally short, focused on surrogate outcomes, and were heterogeneous in the sample's risk for coronary disease. Few studies examined treatment combinations other than statin-ezetimibe.
Conclusion:
Limited evidence suggests that combinations of lipid-lowering agents do not improve clinical outcomes more than high-dose statin monotherapy. Very-low-quality evidence favors statin-ezetimibe treatment for attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.
Primary Funding Source:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...