Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy.

Giovanni E Salvi1, Urs Brägger

  • 1Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern CH-3010, Switzerland.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|November 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term outcomes of regenerative periodontal therapy and orthodontic treatment: 20-year results from a prospective study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Crestal Bone Loss and Peri-Implant Conditions at Tissue-Level Implants: Influence of Prosthesis Type After 25 Years.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2026
Same author

Association Between Interproximal Contact Loss and Peri-Implant Diseases in Non-Molar Sites.

The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry·2026
Same author

Soft-Tissue Integration of Dental Implants: Formation, Maintenance, and Relevance for Peri-Implant Health.

Journal of periodontal research·2026
Same author

Non-Surgical Submarginal Instrumentation of Peri-Implant Mucositis With Delivery of Sodium Hypochlorite/Amino Acids and Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

Three-Unit Prosthesis Supported by a Single Implant With Two Cantilever Extensions in the Posterior Region (T-Bridge): Case Report With a 2-Year Follow-Up.

Clinical case reports·2026
Same journal

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Different Types of İmplant- Supported Prostheses: A Retrospective Study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Soft Tissue Dehiscence and Survival of Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Subperiosteal Implants: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Implants with Cylindrical and Conical Internal Cam-Groove Connections.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Robot-Assisted Zygomatic Implant Placement for Hemimaxillectomy Defect Reconstruction: A Case Series.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

7-mm-Diameter Versus 5-mm-Diameter Immediate Post-Extraction Implants in the Molar Region: 1-Year Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence, the Dunning-Kruger Effect, and Implant Treatment Planning.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
See all related articles

Certain factors like cantilever extensions and bruxism increase mechanical complications in implant reconstructions. However, these risks do not affect implant survival rates, offering reassurance for dental implant success.

Area of Science:

  • Dental prosthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Clinical Oral Research

Background:

  • Mechanical and technical complications are significant concerns in implant-supported reconstructions.
  • Understanding risk factors is crucial for improving the longevity and success of dental prostheses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the impact of mechanical/technical risk factors on implant-supported reconstructions.
  • To identify specific design and patient-related factors influencing prosthetic complications.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a comprehensive MEDLINE (PubMed) database search from 1966 to April 2008.
  • Included randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and cohort studies with a minimum 4-year follow-up.
  • Extracted data on 10 identified risk factors from 33 selected studies.

More Related Videos

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

Main Results:

  • Absence of a metal framework in overdentures, cantilever extensions > 15 mm, bruxism, reconstruction length, and history of complications increased mechanical issues.
  • Retention type, angled abutments, crown/implant ratio, and implant number did not correlate with increased complications.
  • No identified mechanical/technical risk factors impacted implant survival or success rates.

Conclusions:

  • Specific factors are associated with increased mechanical/technical complications in implant reconstructions.
  • Implant survival and success rates remain unaffected by these mechanical/technical risk factors.
  • This highlights the importance of managing specific risk factors to minimize prosthetic complications while maintaining implant viability.