Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...
Reinforcement Schedules01:24

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning01:19

Role of Shaping in Operant Conditioning

Shaping is a technique used in operant conditioning to train complex behaviors by rewarding successive approximations toward the target behavior. This method is necessary because organisms are unlikely to perform complex behaviors spontaneously. Instead, shaping breaks down the desired behavior into small, manageable steps.
The steps involved in shaping begin with reinforcing any response that resembles the desired behavior. For example, parents might praise a child for picking up one toy. As...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agent-Based Model of Combined Community- and Jail-Based Take-Home Naloxone Distribution.

JAMA network open·2024
Same author

Building and experimenting with an agent-based model to study the population-level impact of CommunityRx, a clinic-based community resource referral intervention.

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Modeling the transmission of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a dynamic agent-based simulation.

Journal of translational medicine·2014
Same author

AgentCell: a digital single-cell assay for bacterial chemotaxis.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2005
Same journal

Latent Space Projections and Atlases, a Cautionary Tale in Deep Neuroimaging using Autoencoders.

International journal of neural systems·2026
Same journal

Transformer-Based Anomaly Detection for Neurodegenerative Screening in MRI Images.

International journal of neural systems·2026
Same journal

Discrete Wavelet Convolution for Learnable Time-Frequency Representation with Application to Seizure Prediction.

International journal of neural systems·2026
Same journal

Automatic Seizure Detection using Hierarchical Spectral-Temporal Feature Learning with an Imbalance-Aware Transformer.

International journal of neural systems·2026
Same journal

Pyramid Vision Transformer-Enhanced Conformer Network for Epileptic Seizure Recognition Using MultiChannel EEG Signals.

International journal of neural systems·2026
Same journal

A Time-Frequency Decoupled Contrastive Learning Framework for Electroencephalography-Based Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis.

International journal of neural systems·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Reinforcement learning in supply chains.

Annapurna Valluri1, Michael J North, Charles M Macal

  • 1Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, 1150 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. avalluri@gmail.com

International Journal of Neural Systems
|November 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study shows reinforcement learning algorithms significantly impact supply chain management outcomes. However, the slow learning pace suggests humans likely don't use strict reinforcement learning in real-world supply chains.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Operations Research
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Effective supply chain management is crucial for business value and strategic positioning.
  • Human performance in supply chain management varies significantly, prompting research into underlying mechanisms.
  • Reinforcement learning is a leading candidate mechanism from cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence to explain observed behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the comparative behavioral consequences of three reinforcement learning algorithms in a multi-stage supply chain setting.
  • To analyze the impact of specific reinforcement learning algorithms on supply chain management outcomes.
  • To evaluate the applicability of reinforcement learning models to real-world supply chain decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Agent-based modeling was employed to simulate a multi-stage supply chain.
  • Three distinct reinforcement learning algorithms were applied to agents within the simulated supply chain.
  • The stability and coordination behaviors of agents under different learning algorithms were analyzed over extended simulation periods.

Main Results:

  • The choice of reinforcement learning algorithm significantly influences the outcomes in multi-stage supply chains.
  • Reinforcement learning facilitates coordination among multiple learning agents in supply chains.
  • Achieving stability in these supply chain models requires thousands of periods, indicating a slow learning process.

Conclusions:

  • Reinforcement learning algorithms have a demonstrable effect on supply chain dynamics and agent coordination.
  • The extended time required for agents to learn and stabilize in simulated supply chains questions the practical use of strict reinforcement learning by human decision-makers.
  • Findings suggest that real-world supply chain management likely employs different or hybrid decision-making strategies than pure reinforcement learning.