Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
Ecological Disturbance02:26

Ecological Disturbance

An ecological disturbance is a temporary disruption in the environment resulting from abiotic, biotic, or anthropogenic factors, causing a pronounced change in an ecosystem. The impact of an ecological disturbance, which can depend on its intensity, frequency, and spatial distribution, plays a significant role in shaping the species diversity within the ecosystem.Ecological disturbances can be caused by an event as small as the trampling of underbrush to an incident as wide-ranging as a forest...
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Types of Selection01:46

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
Hybrid Zones02:29

Hybrid Zones

Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.Gene flow and natural selection are evolutionary mechanisms that shape the outcome of a hybrid zone. Gene flow...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Novel high-throughput oxygen saturation measurements for quantifying the physiological performance of macroalgal early life stages.

Journal of phycology·2024
Same author

Observation of Cabibbo-Suppressed Two-Body Hadronic Decays and Precision Mass Measurement of the Ω_{c}^{0} Baryon.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Improved Measurement of CP Violation Parameters in B_{s}^{0}→J/ψK^{+}K^{-} Decays in the Vicinity of the ϕ(1020) Resonance.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Measurement of CP Violation in B^{0}→ψ(→ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-})K_{S}^{0}(→π^{+}π^{-}) Decays.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Observation of New Baryons in the Ξ_{b}^{-}π^{+}π^{-} and Ξ_{b}^{0}π^{+}π^{-} Systems.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Precision Measurement of CP Violation in the Penguin-Mediated Decay B_{s}^{0}→ϕϕ.

Physical review letters·2023
Same journal

Combining individual and close-kin mark-recapture to design an effective wildlife population survey.

Ecology·2026
Same journal

Cross-stressor resilience of soil microbial growth and carbon metabolism under climate change.

Ecology·2026
Same journal

Oh deer! Videography reveals a range of defensive behaviors against a cervid by a ground-nesting bird.

Ecology·2026
Same journal

Microbial responses to stress do not promote plant tolerance to same or different stressors.

Ecology·2026
Same journal

A 2100-km jaguar journey redefines mobility and large-scale conservation priorities during large carnivore dispersal.

Ecology·2026
Same journal

Linking genome size variation to phenotypic selection on target traits.

Ecology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

Do modified habitats have direct or indirect effects on epifauna?

E M Marzinelli1, C J Zagal, M G Chapman

  • 1Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, Marine Ecology Laboratories A11, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. emarzinelli@eicc.bio.usyd.edu.au

Ecology
|November 6, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Artificial marine structures directly impact epifauna abundance, not kelp type. Experiments show habitat properties, not kelp characteristics, influence species cover on pilings versus natural reefs.

More Related Videos

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model
08:14

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model

Published on: February 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity
08:16

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model
08:14

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model

Published on: February 28, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Marine ecology
  • Habitat modification
  • Artificial reef ecology

Background:

  • Natural habitats are increasingly replaced by artificial structures (e.g., pilings, seawalls).
  • The direct or indirect effects of these novel habitats on marine biota abundance are not well understood.
  • Sydney Harbour's modified marine environments offer opportunities to study these ecological impacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To distinguish between direct and indirect effects of artificial structures on marine epifauna.
  • To determine if habitat type or kelp characteristics influence epifauna cover.
  • To understand the ecological consequences of habitat replacement in marine systems.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of epifauna cover on kelp from pilings versus natural reefs.
  • Experimental transplantation of kelp between pilings and reefs.
  • Analysis of factors influencing epifauna cover, including habitat properties and kelp type.

Main Results:

  • Higher covers of bryozoans and hydroids were observed on kelp growing on pilings compared to natural reefs.
  • Experimental kelp transplantation demonstrated that habitat properties directly affected epifauna cover.
  • Epifauna cover was not influenced by the type of kelp found on pilings or rocky reefs.

Conclusions:

  • Artificial marine habitats directly influence epifauna abundance.
  • Habitat modification effects are primarily direct, mediated by structure properties rather than associated kelp characteristics.
  • Further manipulative experiments are crucial for understanding human impacts on marine biota.