Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The no-scalpel vasectomy.

S Q Li1, M Goldstein, J Zhu

  • 1Chongqing Family Planning Scientific Research Institute, China.

The Journal of Urology
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Use of oral contraceptives in BRCA mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2021
Same author

Intravenous leiomyomatosis: Case series and review of the literature.

International journal of surgery case reports·2021
Same author

Revealing x-ray and gamma ray temporal and spectral similarities in the GRB 190829A afterglow.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same author

Hormone replacement therapy in BRCA mutation carriers and risk of ovarian, endometrial, and breast cancer: a systematic review.

Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology·2021
Same author

Use of fertility treatments in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2020
Same author

Use of oral contraceptives in BRCA mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review.

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2020
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

A novel scalpel-free vasectomy technique significantly reduces complications like hematomas and infections. This minimally invasive approach offers a faster recovery and smaller wound for improved patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Conventional vasectomy techniques can lead to complications such as hematomas and infections.
  • There is a need for improved vasectomy methods that minimize invasiveness and enhance patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and evaluate a refined, scalpel-free vasectomy delivery method.
  • To assess the safety, efficacy, and operative time of this novel technique.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes an extracutaneous fixation ring clamp to secure the vas deferens without skin penetration.
  • Employs a sharp curved hemostat for scrotal skin and vas sheath puncture and dilation.
  • Allows for bilateral vas delivery through a single, small puncture site.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Reported hematoma incidence of 0.09% in 179,741 men in China.
  • Zero hematomas or infections observed in the first 273 procedures in the United States.
  • Operating time ranged from 5 to 11 minutes.

Conclusions:

  • The refined vasectomy technique is associated with significantly lower rates of hematoma and infection.
  • This minimally invasive method offers a rapid, sutureless wound closure and reduced operating time.
  • While requiring hands-on training for proficiency, the technique's advantages warrant its wider adoption.