Cervical spine clearance in the nonalert, noncommunicative, or unreliable pediatric blunt trauma patient

Diana Ropele1, Kari Blech, Karen J Vander Laan

  • 1Pediatric Trauma Program Nurse, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Spectrum Health in Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA. diana.ropele@devoschildrens.org

Insights

Pediatric cervical spine clearance lacks a national guideline for trauma patients. Current practices vary widely among US trauma centers regarding diagnostic testing sequences and time frames for children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Trauma Care
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Absence of a nationally recognized, evidence-based guideline for cervical spine clearance in pediatric blunt trauma patients who are nonalert, noncommunicative, or unreliable.
  • Need to understand current practices and expert opinions in specialized pediatric trauma centers within the United States.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify current practices for pediatric cervical spine clearance in US trauma centers.
  • To elicit expert opinion data on diagnostic testing sequences and time frames for pediatric cervical spine clearance.
  • To explore perceived barriers and supports for implementing standardized diagnostic testing protocols.

Main Methods:

  • Descriptive survey study utilizing a 93-item electronic Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Survey.
  • Survey distributed to 309 members of the Pediatric Special Interest Group of the National Society of Trauma Nurses.
  • Analysis of responses from 44 participating trauma centers regarding trauma verification, case volume, and diagnostic testing protocols.

Main Results:

  • Significant variability exists in the diagnostic testing sequences and time frames employed by trauma centers for pediatric cervical spine clearance.
  • Respondents provided data on trauma case volumes and specific diagnostic approaches utilized for different pediatric age groups.
  • Identified perceived supports and barriers influencing the adherence to target time frames for diagnostic testing.

Conclusions:

  • Current approaches to pediatric cervical spine clearance in trauma centers are heterogeneous, lacking standardization.
  • The findings highlight the need for developing a national, evidence-based guideline to ensure consistent and optimal care for pediatric trauma patients.
  • Further research is warranted to evaluate the impact of a standardized cervical spine clearance guideline on patient outcomes.